Procedural Regulation of Involuntary Hospitalization According to the Legal Order of the Czech Republic in Comparison with German Legislation

Author:

Podrazil Petr1,Jirásko Vojtěch1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law , Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic

Abstract

Summary The article focuses on the analysis of the procedural arrangements of detention proceedings in the legal order of the Czech Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany. Special attention is paid to the systematic (conceptual) setting of the functioning of procedural adjustments, whose current form is a reflection of the shift or departure from the historical law ratio legis of civil health detention. The historical ratio legis then consists in the protection of the personal freedom of the mentally ill, who were taken into the institution for the insane against their will. Thus, the links between guardianship and detention should not be neglected in the design of procedural procedures. Both procedures should be closely linked. The aim of the article is to analyze the concept of procedural modifications of detention proceedings under German and Czech legislation, also in connection with partial differences within individual procedural law institutes. Special attention is paid to the mutual relation between detention proceedings and custody proceedings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law

Reference7 articles.

1. BARTLETT, Peter, LEWIS, Oliver, THOROLD, Oliver. Mental disability and the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007. 377 p.

2. BIENWALD, Christa. In BIENWALD, Werner, SONNENFELD, Susanne, BIENWALD, Christa, HARM, Uwe. Betreuungsrecht. Kommentar. 6th edition. Nördlingen: CH Beck, 2016, p. 491.

3. DOLEŽAL, Tomáš. In Melzer, Filip, Tegl, Petr. Civil Code. § 1–117. Great comment. Volume I. Prague: Leges, 2013, p. 610.

4. GOFFMAN, Erving. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Reprint. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd, 1973. 386 p.

5. HARRIS, David John et al. Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 902 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3