The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Promoting Horizontal Positive Obligations of the State

Author:

Florczak-Wątor Monika1

Affiliation:

1. Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, Kraków , Poland

Abstract

Summary Over the last forty years the concept of the horizontal positive obligations of the State Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights has been developing in a number of cases of the European Court of Human Rights. This concept extends the protection of Convention rights and freedoms to horizontal relations, that is, to the relations between two private parties. However, the Convention on Human Rights can be violated only by the State; the violation by private parties is not possible, as private parties are not parties to the Conventions. Therefore, the only way to challenge a violation of Convention rights committed by private parties is to link this action to an act or omission of the State, and to claim that the State is responsible for it. This, in turn, requires demonstrating that the Convention obliges the State to protect one individual’s Convention rights from violations committed by other individuals. The State has a wide margin of appreciation as to how it discharges the obligation to protect Convention rights against violations by private individuals.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law

Reference16 articles.

1. AKANDJJ-KOMBE, Jean-François. Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Handbook, 2007, No. 7, pp. 1-68

2. ALKEMA, Evert Albert. The Third-party Applicability or “Drittwirkung” of the European Convention on Human Rights. In MATSCHER, Franz, PETZOLD, Herbert (eds.). Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension, Studies in Honour of Gerard J. Wiadra. Köln-Berlin-Bonn-München: CarlHeymanns Verlag KG, 1988, pp. 33-45

3. BARKHUYSEN, Tom, VAN EMMERIK, Michiel. Constitutionalisation of Private Law: The European Convention of Human Rights Perspective. In BARKHUYSEN, Tom, LINDENBERGH Siewert (eds.). Constitutionalisation of Private Law. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006, pp. 43-5710.1163/ej.9789004148529.i-136

4. CLAPHAM, Andrew. The “Drittwirkung” of the Convention. In MACDONALD, Ronald Saint John, MATSCHER, Franz, PETZOLD, Herbert (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993, pp. 163-206

5. DRZEMCZEWSKI, Andrew. The European Human Rights Convention and Relations between Private Parties, Netherlands International Law Review, 1979, vol. 26, pp. 163-18110.1017/S0165070X00017939

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3