Affiliation:
1. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economic Informatics , University of Economics in Bratislava , Slovakia
2. Department of Mathematics and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economic Informatics , University of Economics in Bratislava , Bratislava , Slovakia
Abstract
Abstract
With respect to the fulfillment of the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, the threat of poverty and social exclusion has not been sufficiently reduced in the European Union (EU) over the past decade, and large regional disparities persist. Young people are the most affected by the problems of income poverty, material deprivation and labour market exclusion, which are the three dimensions of poverty and social exclusion. In this article, we focus on comparing the EU countries in terms of the three listed dimensions, while revealing similarities and differences in the incidence and severity of these social phenomena among youth. In addition to measuring dimensions by the currently used AROPE (at risk of poverty or social exclusion) rate, we also use a larger spectrum of relevant indicators for a more comprehensive analysis. While the AROPE aggregate indicator uses the same methodology for the population of young people as for the whole population, our approach includes indicators that are specific to young people. We assume that all dimensions affect each other, so we apply multidimensional statistical methods such as principal components and cluster analysis to analyse them. These methods have revealed that some dimensions affect poverty and social exclusion to a greater extent and others to a lesser extent than might appear to be the case, based on AROPE’s partial rates. Moreover, we present quantified integral indicators that together with the results of the multivariate methods, provide a rather complex picture concerning the geographical distribution of poverty and social exclusion, as well as their dimensions in the EU, for the population of persons aged 18–24 years in 2008 and 2017.
Reference58 articles.
1. AASSVE, A., COTTINI, E., VITALI, A. (2013): Youth prospects in a time of economic recession. Demographic Research, 29: 949–962.10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.36
2. ANDRIOPOULOU, E., KARAKITSIOS, A., TSAKLOGLOU, P. (2017): Inequality and poverty in Greece: Changes in times of crisis. GLO Discussion Paper, No. 119, Global Labor Organization (GLO), Maastricht [online]. [cit. 15.04.2019]. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/16856910.2139/ssrn.3041802
3. ATKINSON, A. B., GUIO, A. C., MARLIER, E. (2017): Monitoring social inclusion in Europe–2017 edition. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
4. AYLLÓN, S., GÁBOS, A. (2017): The interrelationships between the Europe 2020 poverty and social exclusion indicators. Social Indicators Research, 130(3): 1025–1049.10.1007/s11205-015-1212-2
5. BRADFORD, S., CULLEN, F. (2014): Youth policy in austerity Europe. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 19(sup1.): 1–4.10.1080/02673843.2013.874104
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献