Affiliation:
1. University of Lodz , Faculty of Geographical Sciences , Łódź , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
The main purpose of the research is to address the real, operational context of participatory budgeting. It is argued that this method of budgeting might be a useful tool for developing various ideas at a local level, including social/spatial justice, civil society, human capital, information society, or sustainable development. However, the implementation of participatory budgeting might, conversely, result from development processes. A combination of quantitative methods (principal component analysis and regression analysis) was applied to define the real motives for local authorities to employ participatory budgeting. To address the research questions mentioned in the paper, all rural communes employing participatory budgeting in Poland in 2017 were investigated. It was confirmed that participatory budgeting is an effect of development processes rather than a tool for achieving development goals. Interestingly, social/spatial injustice might significantly stimulate inhabitants’ engagement in participatory budgeting. On the other hand, the development of information society supports processes related to social involvement, including participatory budgeting.
Reference97 articles.
1. Allegretti, G. (2011). From Scepticism to Mutual Support: Towards a Structural Change in the Relations between Participatory Budgeting and the Information and Communication Technologies? In P. Mindus, A. Greppi, and M. Cuono (Eds.), Legitimacy 2.0: E-Democracy and Public Opinion in the Digital Age, Frankfurt, 145–182.
2. Anheier, H.K. (2013). Civil society: Measurement, evaluation, policy. Civil Society: Measurement, Evaluation, Policy. London: Earthscan.
3. Aragonès, E. and Sánchez-Pagés, S. (2009). A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre. European Economic Review, 53: 56–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.09.006
4. Axyonova, V. and Bossuyt, F. (2016). Mapping the substance of the EU's civil society support in Central Asia: From neo-liberal to state-led civil society. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(3): 207–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcom-stud.2016.06.005
5. Bǎdescu, G. and Sum, P.E. (2005). Historical legacies, social capital and civil society: Comparing Romania on a regional level. Europe - Asia Studies, 57(1): 117–133.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献