The Role of Modern Techniques in Preservation of Archaeological Sites

Author:

Chabuk Mahmood1,Al-Amiri Shatha2

Affiliation:

1. 1 University of Babylon , Babylon , Iraq

2. 2 University of Baghdad , Baghdad , Iraq

Abstract

Abstract Archaeological sites have always suffered from loss and degradation due to many human and natural hazards. In recent decades, interest in preserving archaeological sites has increased dramatically. Many modern techniques have emerged from the different disciplines that can be used in preservation works, and a large number of the techniques and their capability made it difficult for decision-makers and specialists to determine the appropriate technique that gives the best results in preserving the archaeological site. The research aims to identify the project needed to preserve the archaeological site and then choose the appropriate technique for it, based on the opinions of experts using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, which helps decision-makers and specialists to choose the most appropriate technology. The archaeological site of Babylon was chosen as a case study. As a result of applying the AHP method, the priority weights of preservation stages for the archaeological site of Babylon were determined as follows: (diagnosis and monitoring 30.8 %), (intervention 21.2 %), and (tourism and media 16.6 %), while the appropriate technique was determined as follows: (infrared thermography 29.4 %), (maintenance 49.3 %), and (augmented reality 38.7 %).

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,History,Architecture,Geography, Planning and Development,Conservation

Reference36 articles.

1. Febro, D. 3D documentation of cultural heritage sites using drone and photogrammetry: A case study of Philippine UNESCO-recognized Baroque churches. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 11, no. 8, 2020, pp. 1‒14.

2. Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites: Uk policy and practice. China Cultural Heritage, no. 2, 2020, pp. 25‒35.

3. Rebec, K. M., Deanovič, B., Oostwegel, L. Old buildings need new ideas: Holistic integration of conservation-restoration process data using heritage building information modelling. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 55, 2022, pp. 30‒42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.02.005

4. Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites. In López Varela, S. L. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, pp. 1‒4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0476

5. Haddad, N. A., Fakhoury, L. A., Sakr, Y. M. A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documentation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 291‒310.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3