Affiliation:
1. Statistical Methods Unit , Stats NZ 8 Willis Street, PO Box 2922, Wellington 6011 , New Zealand .
Abstract
Abstract
Many countries conduct a full census survey to report official population statistics. As no census survey ever achieves 100% response rate, a post-enumeration survey (PES) is usually conducted and analysed to assess census coverage and produce official population estimates by geographic area and demographic attributes. Considering the usually small size of PES, direct estimation at the desired level of disaggregation is not feasible. Design-based estimation with sampling weight adjustment is a commonly used method but is difficult to implement when survey nonresponse patterns cannot be fully documented and population benchmarks are not available. We overcome these limitations with a fully model-based Bayesian approach applied to the New Zealand PES. Although theory for the Bayesian treatment of complex surveys has been described, published applications of individual level Bayesian models for complex survey data remain scarce. We provide such an application through a case study of the 2018 census and PES surveys. We implement a multilevel model that accounts for the complex design of PES. We then illustrate how mixed posterior predictive checking and cross-validation can assist with model building and model selection. Finally, we discuss potential methodological improvements to the model and potential solutions to mitigate dependence between the two surveys.
Reference44 articles.
1. Atkinson, J., C. Salmond, and P. Crampton. 2019. NZ Dep 2013 index of deprivation interim research report. Technical report, Department of Public Health, University of Otago,Wellington. Available at: https://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/otago730394.pdf. (accessed February 2022).
2. Brown, J.J., C. Sexton, O. Abbott, and P.A. Smith. 2019. “The framework for estimating coverage in the 2011 census of England and Wales: Combining dual-system estimation with ratio estimation.” Statistical Journal of the International Association of Official Statistics 35: 481–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-180426.
3. Bryant, J., K. Dunstan, P. Graham, N. Matheson-Dunning, E. Shrosbree, and R. Speirs. 2016. Measuring uncertainty in the 2013-base estimated resident population (Statistics New Zealand Working paper: 16–04). Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand. Available at: https://www.stats.govt.nz/ (accessed February 2022).
4. Chandrasekar, C. and W.E. Deming. 1949. “On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 44: 101–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1949.10483294.
5. Chen, C., J. Wakefield, and T. Lumley. 2014. “The use of sampling weights in Bayesian hierarchical models for small area estimation.” Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology 11: 33–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2014.07.002.435736325457595
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献