The Effect of Co-Administration of Inactivated Vaccines Against Bovine Respiratory Disease and Neonatal Calf Diarrhoea
Author:
Makoschey B.1, Vertenten G.1, Reddick D.2
Affiliation:
1. Intervet International BV/MSD-Animal Health , Wim de Körverstraat, 5831AN Boxmeer The Netherlands 2. Moredun Scientific, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PZ United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
A pilot study was performed to evaluate the safety and serological responses after co-administration of two multivalent inactivated vaccines to pregnant cattle. One vaccine was directed against bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and contained antigens of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), parainfluenza 3 virus (PI3) and Mannheimia haemolytica (Mh). The second vaccine targeted neonatal calf diarrhoea (NCD) and was composed of inactivated antigens of bovine rotavirus (BRV), bovine coronavirus (BCV) and E. coli. The use of these combinations have been used more and more by veterinary practitioners as there exist some clear evidence that both vaccines improves the passive protection via the colostrum for the relevant pathogens. However, up until now, no safety or efficacy data has been available concerning such co-administrations. The safety of both vaccines and the serological responses to the BRD vaccine has been evaluated when used at the same time, but without mixing and compared to the responses to the administration of each vaccine independently. There was no evidence of any negative effect on calving or calf health in any of the vaccinated animals. The antibody levels against BRSV and Mh in the sera of the calves from cows vaccinated with both vaccines were not significantly different from the levels in the sera of calves vaccinated with the BRD vaccine alone. The results from this pilot study demonstrated that the co-administration of the two multivalent inactivated vaccines had no detrimental effect on the safety or serological responses to the BRD vaccine compared to the independent use of the vaccines.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference20 articles.
1. 1. Bartels, C. J., Holzhauer, M., Jorritsma, R., Swart, W. A., Lam, T. J., 2010: Prevalence, prediction and risk factors of enteropathogens in normal and non-normal faeces of young Dutch dairy calves. Prev. Vet. Med., 93, 2—3, 162—169. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.09.020. 2. 2. Brscic, M., Leruste, H., Heutinck, L. F., Bokkers, E. A., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Stockhofe, N., et al., 2012: Prevalence of respiratory disorders in veal calves and potential risk factors. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 5, 2753—2764. DOI: 10.3168/jds. 2011-4699. 3. 3. Cervino, M., Figueras, L., Martin, S., Elvira, L., Callus, M., Dowlut, S., et al., 2011: Specific humoral response and effect on rectal temperature of two clostridial vaccines in lambs. Vet. Rec., 168, 17, 458. DOI: 10.1136/vr.c6865. 4. 4. Crouch, C. F., Oliver, S., Francis, M. J., 2001: Serological, colostral and milk responses of cows vaccinated with a single dose of a combined vaccine against rotavirus, coronavirus and Escherichia coli F5 (K99). Vet. Rec., 149, 4, 105—108. DOI: 10.1136/vr.149.4.105. 5. 5. Garcia, A., Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J. A., Orden, J. A., Cid, D., Sanz, R., Gomez-Bautista, M., et al., 2000: Rotavirus and concurrent infections with other enteropathogens in neonatal diarrheic dairy calves in Spain. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 23, 3, 175—183. DOI: 10.1016/s0147-9571(99)00071-5.
|
|