A comparison of the potential of Clinical Trials Centers within both public and commercial trial facilities

Author:

Huskowska-Strozek Marlena12,Wos Michal1ORCID,Kominek Anna3,Drop Katarzyna4ORCID,Skorka Katarzyna5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics with E-learning Lab, Medical University of Lublin , Poland

2. Clinical Trials Support Center , Medical University of Lublin , Poland

3. University Clinical Trials Support Center in Poznan, Medical University of Poznan , Poland

4. Department of Language , Rhetoric and Media Law , Institute of Journalism and Management , Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II , Poland

5. Department of Experimental Hematooncology , Medical University of Lublin , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Clinical trials are an integral part of the process of developing new drugs, diagnostic methods and medical devices. Clinical trials offer patients the chance to access alternative treatment methods, thereby improving their quality of life, and even achieving recovery. Additionally, clinical trials provide the opportunity for regular contact with a specialist doctor and easier access to diagnostics, ensuring a faster therapeutic path for the patient. One of the key aspects of conducting clinical trials is choosing the right investigator and research center so as to meet specific criteria and guarantee high quality of the conducted studies. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the differences between conducting clinical trials in public and commercial centers. A diagnostic survey was used in the study and the research tool chosen was a proprietary questionnaire belonging to the research technique as survey questionnaire. Questionnaires were constructed for the appropriate stakeholders/respondents, namely: doctors and employees of pharmaceutical companies and CROs. The analysis showed that employees of pharmaceutical companies, given the choice, prefer to cooperate with commercial centers. They choose public centers only when they need a center for phase one trials or those requiring hospitalization. The research obtained shows that public centers should improve administrative processes in order to optimize tasks such as contracting or obtaining a study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference7 articles.

1. Industry Clinical Trials in Poland Possibilities to increase number and scope of trials in Poland. Infarma; 2021. [https://www.infarma.pl/assets/files/2022/CT_REPORT_in_PL_PL.pdf.]

2. Sedrak MS, Freedman RA, Cohen HA, Muss HB, Jatai A, Klepin HD, et al. Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):78-92.

3. Adams A, Adelfio A, Barnes B, Berlien R, Branco D, Coogan A, et al. Risk-based monitoring in clinical trials: 2021 update. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023;57(3):529-37.

4. Miyazaki K, Saito H. Sponsors’ experiences with site management organizations in Japan. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013;36(4):763-8.

5. Tańska E. Selected aspects of conducting clinical trials in Poland from the perspective of an oncology center (review paper). Uniwersytet Wrocławski; 2021:371-88.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3