Public Institutions and Ngos Cooperation for Social Innovations in Post-Socialist Rural Poland

Author:

Zajda Katarzyna1ORCID,Mazurek Damian2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rural and Urban Sociology , University of Lodz , Poland

2. Department of Rural Geography and Local Development , Inistitute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences , Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Social innovation (SI), which is known as an alternative practice for solving social problems, can be implemented by various actors, including nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and public institutions. This article addresses the implementation of SIs by public institutions in rural areas of Poland. Its aim is to answer two questions: 1) Does cooperation with NGOs distinguish rural public institutions in Poland that have implemented SIs from those that have not? 2) Does the level of human and financial resources of NGOs affect the level of cooperation between public institutions and NGOs from rural gminas? The results of an internet survey conducted on a random sample of 330 public institutions and 400 one-to-one interviews conducted on a random sample of NGOs from rural communes (rural gminas) are presented to answer the research questions posed. According to the findings, collaboration between public institutions and NGOs does not distinguish institutions that implemented SI and those that did not. In addition, the level of human and financial resources of NGOs was not a factor in determining whether or not public institutions cooperated with NGOs.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference45 articles.

1. [1] Anheier, H. K., Krlev, G., Preuss, S., Mildenberger, G. & Bekkers, R. (2014). Social innovation as impact of the third sector. Impact of the Third Sector as Social Innovation (ITSSOIN), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.

2. [2] Ayob, N., Teasdale, S. & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘‘came to be’’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. DOI: 10.1017/S004727941600009X.10.1017/S004727941600009X

3. [3] Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. G., Stuijfzand, B. G. & Voorberg, W. (2013). Social innovation in the public sector: An integrative framework. LIPSE working papers (no. 1). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.

4. [4] Bendowska, E., Borawska, M., Jankowski, Ł., Kalski, J., Lech, I., Medolińska, K., Pytalska, A., Stawikowska, M., Wielechowska, K. & Zych, M. (2020). Rural areas in Poland 2018. Warszawa-Olsztyn: Statistical Office in Olsztyn.

5. [5] Bock, B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation: a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3