Affiliation:
1. Department of Geography and Regional Science , University of Graz , Austria
Abstract
Abstract
Encapsulating the destination’s USPs and identity in a logo with high recognition value is a challenge DMOs face. This recognisability as key to a ‘strong brand’ is particularly based on natural resources and the attractiveness of landscapes that form the basis of touristic USP in most destinations. The paper stresses the importance of the logo and that the destination’s ‘DNA’ or identity must be transposed symbolically and naturally by integrating distinctive landscape elements into the logo. Ideally, they merge authentically and harmoniously, fostering identification among locals and tourists, brand awareness and a positive image, contributing to a strong, authentic brand. A 40% presence of landscape elements (mountains prevailed by 85%) was found in the top 50 Austrian logos.
Reference91 articles.
1. Adams, S., Morioka, N. & Stone, T. (2004). Logo Design Workbook. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
3. Assmann, J. (2018). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. München: Beck Paperback.
4. Benur, A. M. & Bramwell, B. (2015). Tourism product development and product diversification in destinations. Tourism Management, 50, 213–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.02.005.
5. Beritelli, P. & Laesser, C. (2018). Destination logo recognition and implications for intentional destination branding by DMOs: A case for saving money. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.08.010.