Affiliation:
1. Universidade Estadual Paulista
Abstract
Abstract
I here present and discuss Husserl’s clarification of the genesis of modern empirical science, particularly its mathematical methods, as presented in his last work, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Although Husserl’s analyses have as their goal to redirect science to the lifeworld and to reposition man and his immediate experiences at the foundation of the scientific project so as to overcome the “crisis” of science, I approach them from a different perspective. The problem that interests me here is the applicability of mathematics in empirical science, to assess Husserl’s treatment of this issue in order to see if it can be sustained from a strictly scientific point of view regardless of philosophical adequacy. My conclusion is that it cannot. What Husserl takes as the “crisis” of science is inherent to the best scientific methodology.
Reference9 articles.
1. Bloch, Felix (1976). “Heisenberg and the Early Days of Quantum Mechanics.” In Physics Today 29, no. 12: 23-27.10.1063/1.3024633
2. Da Silva, Jairo José (2014). Husserl and the Principle of Bivalence. In: Hill, Clarice Ortiz; da Silva, Jairo José, 285-298.
3. Da Silva, Jairo José (2017). “Husserl and Weyl” In Stefania Centrone (ed.) Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. The Hague: Springer, pp. 317-52.10.1007/978-94-024-1132-4_13
4. Hill, Clarice Ortiz; da Silva, Jairo José (2013). The Road Not Taken, On Husserl’s Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. London: College Publications.
5. Hopkins, Burt. (2011). The Origins of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics. London: Bloomington.