Those Who Shall Be Identified: The Data Protection Aspects of the Legal Framework for Electronic Identification in the European Union

Author:

Andraško Jozef1,Mesarčík Matúš1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law , Comenius University in Bratislava , Šafárikovo nám. č. 6, Bratislava 810 00 , Slovakia

Abstract

Abstract The article focuses on the intersections of the regulation of electronic identification as provided in the eIDAS Regulation and data protection rules in the European Union. The first part of the article is devoted to the explanation of the basic notions and framework related to the electronic identity in the European Union— the eIDAS Regulation. The second part of the article discusses specific intersections of the eIDAS Regulation with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), specifically scope, the general data protection clause and mainly personal data processing in the context of mutual recognition of electronic identification means. The article aims to discuss the overlapping issues of the regulation of the GDPR and the eIDAS Regulation and provides a further guide for interpretation and implementation of the outcomes in practice.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference34 articles.

1. Andraško, J. (2016), ‘Electronic identification and authentication in the context of electronic public administration services,’ CER Comparative European Research, no. 2, pp. 75–78.

2. Andraško, J. (2017), ‘Mutual recognition of electronic identification means under the EIDAS Regulation and its application issues,’ AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 9–13.

3. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2007), Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data adopted on 20th June, 01248/07/EN WP 136.

4. Bygrave, L. (2017), ‘Data protection by design and by default: Deciphering the EU’s legislative requirements,’ Oslo Law Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 105–120. http://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2017-02-0310.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-02-03

5. Carpenter, C. (2020), ‘Privacy and proportionality: Examining mass electronic surveillance under Article 8 and the Fourth Amendment,’ International Comparative Law Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 27–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-000210.2478/iclr-2020-0002

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3