Affiliation:
1. Department of Law, School of Business and Governance , Tallinn University of Technology , Ehitajate tee 5 , Tallinn , Estonia
Abstract
Abstract
Following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the restrictions imposed by the Member States (MSs) of the European Union (EU) led the tourism and commercial air transport industry to face serious financial difficulties that required airlines to apply for state support. In March 2020, the European Commission adopted a State Aid Temporary Framework (TF) for the COVID-19 period to simplify the process of granting aid, allowing the MSs rapid economic interventions. Claims regarding the approval of State aid to certain airlines reached the EU General Court (EGC), on the grounds of violation of the fair competition principle. It became clear that the processes enabled by the TF dispensed unequal treatment to airline companies and that the flexibility of the TF created competition imbalances. In spite of these events, little attention has been given to the way its application ignores the requirements of EU State aid control and other procedural justice and fairness principles, by failing to ensure neutrality and equality. This article addresses the matter using a standard legal interpretive approach to explain the imbalances created by the regulation. It presents a systematic review of the current regime, identifies the TF inefficiencies affecting competition principles, and argues for specific adjustments that could enhance its transparency. These contributions are useful to improve the existing framework and help prepare for a better management of future crises.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference65 articles.
1. Adler, E.; Kavanagh, J. & Ugryumov, A. (2009), ‘State aid to banks in the financial crisis: The past and the future,’ Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpp006
2. Agnolucci, I. (2021), ‘Will COVID-19 make or break EU State aid control? An analysis of Commission decisions authorising pandemic State aid measures,’ Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab060
3. Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v. Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark Judgement) [2003], C-280/00, ECR 2003, I, 007747, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
4. Bacon, K. (2017), European Union Law of State Aid, 3rd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Barents, R. (2014), ‘EU procedural law and effective legal protection,’ Common Law Market Review, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1437–1461.10.54648/COLA2014112