Affiliation:
1. Professor of Public Administration, Institute of International Relations and Political Science , Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania .
Abstract
Abstract
The article analyses changes in the reform agendas of the Lithuanian government in the period 2004 – 2017. Instead of exploring the systemic and formal agendas of administrative reforms based on government strategies and programmes, it focuses on the institutional and actual agendas of Lithuanian authorities using a set of 20 reform initiatives. In addition to the analysis of the institutional context, we also assess a coupling logic and the exercise of political or bureaucratic entrepreneurship during reform policy making. The article finds that budgetary constraints and the reform policy priorities of the Lithuanian governments explain the ambitious agendas of administrative reforms during the 2008 – 2012 government and, to a lesser extent, during the 2016 – 2020 government. The political logic of coupling and political entrepreneurship dominated the flow of the reform process when these governments were in office, producing the top-down approach to reform policy making. In contrast, the 2004 – 2006, 2006 – 2008 and 2012 – 2016 governments relied strongly on a policy-centred logic of coupling together with bureaucratic entrepreneurship, which resulted in the bottom-up approach to administrative reforms in the country.
Reference24 articles.
1. Ackrill, R., A. Kay and N. Zahariadis. 2013. “Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 20(6), 871 – 887.10.1080/13501763.2013.781824
2. Cairney, P. and M. D. Jones. 2016. “Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory ?” The Policy Studies Journal 44(1), 37 – 58.10.1111/psj.12111
3. Dan, S. and C. Pollitt. 2014. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17(9), 1305 – 1332.10.1080/14719037.2014.908662
4. European Commission. 2017a. Quality of Public Administration: A Toolbox for Practitioners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
5. European Commission. 2017b. “ESF Support to Administrative Modernisation.” Background paper for discussion in the ESF Technical Working Group, April.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献