Affiliation:
1. Public Finance and Fiscal Decentralization Consultant , Ukraine .
2. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv , Ukraine .
Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines the progress of implementing a comprehensive decentralization program in Ukraine. Ukraine was practically the last country of the former Soviet bloc to undertake a comprehensive decentralization program. The decentralization program was based on three pillars: (1) a reliance on voluntary amalgamation of the local government units, (2) the use of inter-municipal cooperation, and (3) enhanced financial incentives. The authors examine how these policies were implemented as well as the impact on local governments service delivery and fiscal capacity. The analyses are based on available data and the application of statistical tests measuring fiscal resources to the population size and other variables of the local government. The study has revealed some significant flaws in Ukrainian decentralization policy implementation. The voluntary approach eventually had to be abandoned for a mandatory approach. The weak progress in inter-municipal cooperation did not establish improved service delivery across a large number of local government units. The financial incentives with greater sharing of taxes did not provide sufficient additional resources to make the units financially sustainable. Finally, the results of the local government elections held in the amalgamated units did not reveal widespread support for the new units and the decentralization reforms. These issues create significant risks for the final success of the decentralization reform.
Reference54 articles.
1. Bel, Germa and Marianna Sebo. 2019. “Does Inter-Municipal Cooperation Really Reduce Delivery Costs ? An Empirical Evaluation of the Role of Scale Economies, Transaction Costs, and Governance Arrangements.” Urban Affairs Review. doi:10.1177/1078087419839492.
2. Bird, Richard M., Robert D. Ebel and Christina I. Wallich (eds). 1995. Decentralization of the Socialist State: Intergovernmental Finance in Transition Economies. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
3. Carmeli, Abraham. 2002. “Relationship between Organizational and Structural Characteristics and Local Authority’s Fiscal Health.” Public Administration Quarterly 26(3), 426 – 464.
4. Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform of the Council of Europe and Pawel Swianiewicz. 2017. Report on Municipal Amalgamation and Possible Impact on Territorial Reform of Upper Tiers of Government. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
5. Charbit, Yves. 2002. “The Platonic City: History and Utopia.” Population (English edition) 57(2), 207 – 235.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献