Key Criteria Influencing Stakeholders’ Decision-making about PB Continuation: The Case of the Czech Republic

Author:

Kukučková Soňa1,Bakoš Eduard2

Affiliation:

1. 1 Department of Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics , Mendel University , Brno , Czech Republic .

2. 2 Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic .

Abstract

Abstract Participatory budgeting (PB) is a modern trend involving citizens in decisions on distributing public resources. Assuming that the identified drawbacks of PB are described as internal and external factors, simple criteria were developed to predict the fate of PB. These criteria reflect stakeholders’ decisions about PB continuation in the future. Using panel data between 2017-2022 from the Czech Republic, it appears that the selected criteria were evaluated as an upgrading process, signalling the continuation of PB. However, this does not mean abandoning the process in the case of downgrading. The results indicate a certain probability for upgrading PB to continue, while the fate of downgrading PB is indeterminate and could depend on other factors. In the case of new governance after an electoral change, using the criteria could help explain the actual situation regarding the interest of stakeholders in PB.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference54 articles.

1. Allegretti, G. (2014). Paying attention to the participants’ perceptions in order to trigger a virtuous circle. In Hope for Democracy - 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide (pp. 47-64). IOPD.

2. Allegretti, G., & Herzberg, C. (2004). Participatory budgets in Europe. Between efficiency and growing local democracy. In TNI Briefing Series 2004/5 (pp. 1-24). Transnational Institute and the Centre for Democratic Policy-Making.

3. Alves, M. G., & Allegretti, G. (2012). (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.147

4. Avritzer, L. (2017). Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest. Opinião Pública 23(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191201723143

5. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3