Affiliation:
1. UNIVERSUM College , Department of Political Science , Republic of Kosovo .
2. South East European University , Faculty of Contemporary Social Sciences , Republic of North Macedonia .
Abstract
Abstract
In 2018, the Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo approved the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, setting up the foundations of the whistleblower protection system for the public and private sectors in the country. In line with the international principles for drafting legislation for the protection of whistleblowers, the law provides three channels for reporting wrongdoing and grants protection against any form of retaliation for whistleblowers.
Noting the absence of institutional data on whistleblowing in the public sector, for this research article, a survey was implemented with individual members of civil service in Kosovo (n=400), during the period from September to November 2019, to collect primary data related to factors incentivizing and / or discouraging the decision to whistleblow. Data were collected at the national and local levels of state administration, as per the scope of the definition of the civil service by Kosovo legislation.
In this contribution, research results reveal that the protection against any form of retaliation guaranteed by the law is not sufficient for members of civil service in Kosovo to support the decision to whistleblow, as concerns arise for the security and physical integrity of their respective family members. Law does not provide financial incentives for civil servants to whistleblow. Data reveal that a satisfactory level of trust is missing on organizational indicators such as trust in the responsible officer, protection of data confidentiality and anonymity, across different levels of categories of civil service.
In line with the concerns voiced by members of civil service and international standards for whistleblower protection, the following actionable recommendations are proposed to advance the whistleblowing system in Kosovo: 1) Improve the provision of training for members of civil service on whistleblowing legislation, organizational procedures, whistleblower protection, and rights; 2) Establish strategies to support employees for whistleblowing. Such strategies would include programs enabling whistleblowers access to professional services such as stress management, counseling, and legal services; 3) Enhance security measures for the physical integrity of whistleblowers and their respective family members; 4) Establish incentives to encourage whistleblowing, such as financial rewards.
Reference37 articles.
1. Apaza, C. R. and Y. Chang. 2017. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In C. Apaza and Y. Chang (eds). Whistleblowing in the World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1 – 8.
2. Apaza C. R., Chang Y. 2020. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In: Apaza C., Chang Y. (eds) What Makes Effective Whistleblowing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1 – 10.
3. Assembly of Republic of Kosovo. 2018. “Law No. 06 / L-085 on Protection of Whistleblowers”. Available at https://md.rks-gov.net/desk/inc/media/701773B8-903F-476F-9D1E-2F7CC2C86A84.pdf (last accessed July 5, 2021).
4. Brown, A. J., Lawrence, S., Olsen J., Rosemann L., Hall K., Tsahuridu, E., Wheeler, Ch., Macaulay, M., Smith R., Brough, P. 2019.” Clean as a Whistle: A Five Step Guide to Better Whistleblowing Policy and Practice in Business and Government: Key Findings and Actions of Whistling While They Work 2”. Brisbane: Griffith University.
5. Brown A. J. and S. A. Lawrence. 2017. Strengthening of Organizational Whistleblowing Processes: Analyses from Australia. Available at https://www.whistlingwhiletheywork.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/WWTW2-Strength-of-whistleblowing-processes-report-Australia-Griffith-University-2May2017.pdf (last accessed February 29, 2021).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献