Measuring Whistleblowing Perceptions among the Civil Service of the Republic of Kosovo

Author:

Baljija Shpresa Kaçiku1,Rustemi Agron2

Affiliation:

1. UNIVERSUM College , Department of Political Science , Republic of Kosovo .

2. South East European University , Faculty of Contemporary Social Sciences , Republic of North Macedonia .

Abstract

Abstract In 2018, the Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo approved the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, setting up the foundations of the whistleblower protection system for the public and private sectors in the country. In line with the international principles for drafting legislation for the protection of whistleblowers, the law provides three channels for reporting wrongdoing and grants protection against any form of retaliation for whistleblowers. Noting the absence of institutional data on whistleblowing in the public sector, for this research article, a survey was implemented with individual members of civil service in Kosovo (n=400), during the period from September to November 2019, to collect primary data related to factors incentivizing and / or discouraging the decision to whistleblow. Data were collected at the national and local levels of state administration, as per the scope of the definition of the civil service by Kosovo legislation. In this contribution, research results reveal that the protection against any form of retaliation guaranteed by the law is not sufficient for members of civil service in Kosovo to support the decision to whistleblow, as concerns arise for the security and physical integrity of their respective family members. Law does not provide financial incentives for civil servants to whistleblow. Data reveal that a satisfactory level of trust is missing on organizational indicators such as trust in the responsible officer, protection of data confidentiality and anonymity, across different levels of categories of civil service. In line with the concerns voiced by members of civil service and international standards for whistleblower protection, the following actionable recommendations are proposed to advance the whistleblowing system in Kosovo: 1) Improve the provision of training for members of civil service on whistleblowing legislation, organizational procedures, whistleblower protection, and rights; 2) Establish strategies to support employees for whistleblowing. Such strategies would include programs enabling whistleblowers access to professional services such as stress management, counseling, and legal services; 3) Enhance security measures for the physical integrity of whistleblowers and their respective family members; 4) Establish incentives to encourage whistleblowing, such as financial rewards.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference37 articles.

1. Apaza, C. R. and Y. Chang. 2017. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In C. Apaza and Y. Chang (eds). Whistleblowing in the World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1 – 8.

2. Apaza C. R., Chang Y. 2020. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In: Apaza C., Chang Y. (eds) What Makes Effective Whistleblowing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1 – 10.

3. Assembly of Republic of Kosovo. 2018. “Law No. 06 / L-085 on Protection of Whistleblowers”. Available at https://md.rks-gov.net/desk/inc/media/701773B8-903F-476F-9D1E-2F7CC2C86A84.pdf (last accessed July 5, 2021).

4. Brown, A. J., Lawrence, S., Olsen J., Rosemann L., Hall K., Tsahuridu, E., Wheeler, Ch., Macaulay, M., Smith R., Brough, P. 2019.” Clean as a Whistle: A Five Step Guide to Better Whistleblowing Policy and Practice in Business and Government: Key Findings and Actions of Whistling While They Work 2”. Brisbane: Griffith University.

5. Brown A. J. and S. A. Lawrence. 2017. Strengthening of Organizational Whistleblowing Processes: Analyses from Australia. Available at https://www.whistlingwhiletheywork.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/WWTW2-Strength-of-whistleblowing-processes-report-Australia-Griffith-University-2May2017.pdf (last accessed February 29, 2021).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3