Affiliation:
1. Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance , Tallinn University of Technology , Tallinn , Estonia .
Abstract
Abstract
One of the most fashionable management concepts currently is Design Thinking (DT). DT is sometimes advertised as the creative and innovative method for handling wicked problems. The explosion of DT in the public sector resembles the fast adoption of Total Quality Management (TQM) a few decades ago. At first sight, DT and TQM appear mutually exclusive – the former emphasizes inventiveness, which is cherished in modern governance, while the latter stresses mechanistic solutions and seems obsolete. Yet, public managers need a clearer understanding of DT and TQM and how they relate to each other. The main aim of this paper is two analyze when public managers should employ DT and when they should use TQM in creating public value. The article compares DT and TQM and finds that they are surprisingly similar. For example, they share core values like user-centeredness, stakeholder commitment, cooperation, etc. That is not to say that DT and TQM are the same, for instance their tools are different. Still, the paper argues that the two management models could well be combined – e.g. DT could assist public managers in finding new solutions to known problems and TQM could be used to institutionalize change. This insight helps managers to make informed decisions when choosing a mix of management methods that fits their purpose best.
Reference59 articles.
1. Allio, L. 2014. Design Thinking for Public Service Excellence. Singapore: Global Centre for Public Service Excellence, United Nations Development Programme. Available at https://www.undp.org/content/dam/uspc/docs/GPCSE_Design%20Thinking.pdf (last accessed 4 April 2021).
2. Antonsen, M. and T. B. Jorgensen. 1997. “The ‘Publicness’ of Public Organizations.” Public Administration 75 (Summer), 337 – 357.
3. Aquilani, B., A. Silvestri, A. Ruggieri and C. Gatti. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review on Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and the Identification of New Avenues of Research.” TQM Journal 29(1), 184 – 213.
4. Barzelay, M. 2019. Public Management as a Design-Oriented Professional Discipline. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Available at https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119108 (last accessed 4 April 2021).
5. Bason, C. 2010. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献