Author:
Zarzycka Beata,Pietruszka Rafał,Śliwak Jacek
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to examine various aspects of religiosity in members of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. First, we assigned intergroup differences in Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions. Next, we estimated the net effects of Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions on religiosity. One hundred fifty–five people participated in the research, 81 members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and 74 members of the Neocatechumenal Way. We applied the Religious Comfort and Strain Scale by Yali, Exline, Wood, and Worthington, the Emotions toward God Scale by Huber and the Religious Attributions Scale by Exline, Park, Smyth and Carey. The results suggest that members of the Neocatechumenal Way do not differ from the Catholic Charismatic Renewal’s members in Religious Comfort and Positive Emotions toward God. However, the members of the Neocatechumenal Way scored higher in Religious Strain. A moderating effect of the religious movement on the relation between Fear of God and religiosity was observed.
Reference45 articles.
1. Abignente, L. (2010). Przeszłość i teraźniejszość – historia jedności [Past and present – history of unity]. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
2. Benson, P., Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self–esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 297–310.
3. Bourque, L. B., Back, K. W. (1971). Language, Society and Subjective Experience. Sociometry, 34(1), 1–21.
4. Bulman, J. R., Wortman C. B. (1977). Attribution of blame and coping in the “real word”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351–363.
5. Coe, J. H. (2000). Musings on the dark night of the soul: Insights from St. John of the Cross on a developmental spirituality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28, 293–307.