Intrapartum transfers from the Birth Centre to the Obstetric Unit in 2017 – analysis of reasons

Author:

Łukasiewicz Aleksandra1,Baranowska Barbara2,Dzierżak-Postek Edyta3,Węgrzyn Piotr4

Affiliation:

1. Student of midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences , Medical University of Warsaw

2. Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education

3. “Żelazna” Medical Center

4. Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology , Medical University of Warsaw

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. The standard of perinatal care gives the woman the right to consciously choose the place of birth. Birth Centres (BC) run by midwives implement a vision of a non-medicalized birth in intimate homelike conditions. Aim. The aim of the study is to determine the causes of transfers from the Birth Centre to the Obstetric Unit and to indicate the social and demographic characteristics of the women giving birth that may predispose to transfer. Material and methods. The study was based on the analysis of the medical records of women who were transferred from the BC to the St. Sophia Obstetric Unit in Warsaw. 88 women who were transferred constituted the study group. Results. The most numerous group were women giving birth aged 30-34. The majority were giving birth for the first time and had higher education. Intrapartum transfers were related to the mother’s obstetric condition, fetal condition or disruption of the childbirth. Conclusions. Failure to progress of labour is the main cause of transfers. The women giving birth for the first time aged 30 and over, admitted for to the BC after 40 weeks of pregnancy and dilation below 4 cm were the most often transferred group of women.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Nursing

Reference17 articles.

1. 1. Wrześniewska M, Bąk B. Historia zawodu położnej i kształtowanie się opieki okołoporodowej na świecie i w Polsce. Studia Medyczne. 2012; 27(3):89-99.

2. 2. Gierszewska M, Kwiatkowska W, Kaźmierczak M. Poród domowy – anachronizm czy wybór i potrzeba świadomych kobiet? Perinatologia, Neonatologia i Ginekologia. 2013; 6(4):220-224.

3. 3. Dziedzic M, Matuszyk D. Prażmowska B. Poród domowy w opinii położnych. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa. 2011; 19(2):153-161.

4. 4. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 16 sierpnia 2018 r. w sprawie standardu organizacyjnego opieki okołoporodowej. Dz.U. 2018; poz. 1756.

5. 5. Pankrac Z, Filipska-Kozak E, Hofman A. Realizacja praw pacjenta podczas porodu w szpitalu. Zdrowie i Dobrostan. 2015;2(1):297-308.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3