Affiliation:
1. Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch , Islamic Azad University , Tehran , Iran
2. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute , Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization (AREEO) Tehran , Iran
Abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, many hydrological rainfall-runoff (R-R) models, both distributed and lumped, have been developed to simulate the catchment. However, selecting the right model to simulate a specific catchment has always been a challenge. A proper understanding of the model and its advantages and limitations is essential for selecting the appropriate model for the purpose of the study. To this end, several studies have been carried out to evaluate the performance of hydrological models for specific areas (mountainous, marshy and so on). This study was conducted aimed at evaluating the performance of MIKE11 NAM lumped conceptual hydrological rainfall-runoff model in simulation of daily flow rate in Gonbad catchment. The NAM model was calibrated and validated using flow rate data of three hydrometric stations of the Gonbad catchment. The model performance was evaluated using Percent bias (PBIAS) and the coefficient of determination or Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient. A Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.80, 0.89 and 080 were obtained during calibration, whereas, for the validation period, NSE of 0.81, 0.87 and 0.71 were obtained for Nemooneh sub catchment, Shahed sub catchment and Gonbad catchment respectively. Percent bias of -0.6, 1.5 and 6.3 were achieved for calibration, while -2.7, 7.6 and -4.2 were acquired during validation for Nemooneh sub catchment, Shahed sub catchment and Gonbad catchment respectively. Based on the results, the MIKE 11 NAM lumped conceptual model was capable of simulating daily mean flow rate and mean flow volume.
Reference21 articles.
1. Amir, M. S. I. I., Khan, M. M. K., Rasul, M.G., Sharma, R. H., & Akram, F. (2013), Automatic multi-objective calibration of a rainfall runoff model for the Fitzroy Catchment, Queensland, Australia International Journal of Environmental Science and Developmen, 4(3): 10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.361.
2. Bergström, S. (1995). The HBV model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.).Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp. 443-476.
3. Danish Hydraulic Institute. MIKE 11: A Modeling System for Rivers and Channels reference manual, 2009, 278-325.
4. DHI S. (2004), MIKE 11 User & Reference Manual, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark.
5. Doulgeris, C., Georgiou, P., Papadimos, D., & Papamichail, D. (2011), Evaluating three different model setups in the MIKE 11 NAM model. InAdvances in the Research of Aquatic Environment, pp. 241-249.10.1007/978-3-642-19902-8_28
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献