A populist turn?

Author:

Ekman Mattias1,Krzyżanowski Michał2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Media Studies , Stockholm University , Sweden

2. Department of Informatics and Media , Uppsala University , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract This article undertakes a critical discourse analysis of Swedish quality newspaper editorials and their evolving framing of immigration since the 2015 peak of the recent European “refugee crisis”. Positioned within the ongoing discursive shifts in the Swedish public sphere and the growth of discursive uncivility in its mainstream areas, the analysis highlights how xenophobic and racist discourses once propagated by the far and radical right gradually penetrate into the studied broadsheet newspapers. We argue that the examined editorials carry the tendency to normalise once radical perceptions of immigration. This takes place by incorporating various discursive strategies embedded in wider argumentative frames – or topoi – of demographic consequences, Islam and Islamisation, threat, and integration. All of these enable constructing claims against immigration now apparently prevalent in the examined strands of the Swedish “quality” press.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication

Reference88 articles.

1. Ahmadi F., Palm, I., & Ahmadi, N. (2016). Mångfaldsbarometern 2016 [The diversity barometer]. Gävle, Sweden: University of Gävle.

2. Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117

3. Andersson, U. (2017). Lågt förtroende för rapporteringen om invandring [Low trust in immigration reporting]. In U. Andersson, A. Ericson, K. Holt, B. Johansson, M. Karlsson, T. von Krogh, E. Lind, J. Strömbäck, L. Weibull, & L. Truedson (Eds.), Misstron mot medier [Distrusting media] (pp. 17–50). Stockholm: The Institute for Media Studies. https://mediestudier.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Misstron_mot_medier.pdf

4. Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2019). An anti-migration campaign and its impact on public opinion: The Hungarian case. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886152

5. Balibar, E. (1991). Is there a ‘neo-racism’? In E. Balibar, & I. Wallerstein (Eds.), Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities (pp. 17–28). London: Verso.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3