Struggling with and mastering e-mail consultations: A study of access, interaction, and participation in a digital health care system

Author:

Grønning Anette1

Affiliation:

1. Department for the Study of Culture , University of Southern Denmark

Abstract

Abstract In Denmark, medical consultations and the institutional practice of going to the doctor have been expanded upon over the past decade, with e-mail consultations (e-consultations) now supplementing conventional consultations. As a form of communication with different constraints than face-to-face and telephonic communication, e-consultations are likely to both afford some benefits and present struggles. In this article, I examine the use and perception of primary care e-consultations from the perspective of the patient. The study is based on qualitative interviews with 20 patients and guided by the following research question: How do patients struggle with and master digital participation during e-consultations? The study demonstrates that e-consultations are more than a digital access point to the healthcare system: patients often struggle to maintain contact with their general practitioner, and e-consultations can help them navigate the healthcare system. Indeed, those who master this form of communication are appreciative of it and perceive it as screen care.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication

Reference42 articles.

1. Assing Hvidt, E., Søndergaard, J., Klausen, M., & Grønning, A. (2020). Not just an information-delivery tool: An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939

2. Bergström, A. (2017). Digital equality and the uptake of digital applications among seniors of different age. Nordicom Review, 38(S1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0398

3. Biro, D. (2011). Listening to pain: Finding words, compassion and relief. W. W. Norton & Company.

4. Carpentier, N. (2011). The concept of participation: If they have access and interact, do they really participate? Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 13–36. https://www.academia.edu/1151341/Interrogating_audiences_Theoretical_horizons_of_participation

5. Carpentier, N., & Dahlgren, P. (2011). Introduction: Interrogating audiences – Theoretical horizons of participation. Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 7–12. https://www.academia.edu/1151341/Interrogating_audiences_Theoretical_horizons_of_participation

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3