Undermining the legitimacy of the news media: How Swedish members of parliament use Twitter to criticise the news media

Author:

Liminga Agnes1,Strömbäck Jesper2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology , Umeå University , Sweden

2. Department of Journalism, Media and Communication , University of Gothenburg , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Over the last decade, the news media increasingly seem to have become a target for politically motivated criticism seeking to delegitimise the news media. The prevalence of delegitimising media criticism is, however, unclear. Hence, the purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which Swedish members of parliament (MPs) engage in delegitimising media criticism on Twitter, the party distribution of those engaging in such media criticism, and the targets and expressions of such media critique. Among other things, the findings show that when MPs tweet about the news media, they are more likely to be critical than supportive, and that a clear majority of tweets that are critical toward the news media contain delegitimising media criticism. Moreover, the results show that MPs from the political right – in particular the Moderate Party and the Sweden Democrats – are most active in tweeting delegitimising media criticism, and that the most common target is public service media.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication

Reference82 articles.

1. Andersson, U. (2017). Lågt förtroende för rapporteringen om invandring [Low trust in the media coverage of immigration]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Misstron mot medier [Media distrust] (pp. 17–50). Institutet för mediestudier.

2. Andersson, U. (2021). Mediers samhällsvärde och oberoende spelar stor roll för förtroendet [The perceived societal value and independence of the news media greatly influences media trust]. In U. Andersson, A. Carlander, M. Grusell, & P. Öhberg (Eds.), Ingen anledning till oro (?) [No reason for worries (?)] (pp. 57–73). SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg.

3. Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

4. Bengtsson, J. (2021). Högerfront mot public service: Vad vill de tre högerpartierna med SVT, SR och UR? [Right-wing front against public service: How do the three right-wing parties want to change SVT, SR, and UR?]. Tankesmedjan Tiden. https://tankesmedjantiden.se/rapport/hogerfront-mot-public-service/

5. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3