Fight For Media Pluralism Or Just “JanŠA’S War On Media”?

Author:

Bratina Rok1

Affiliation:

1. School of Advanced Social Science , Nova Gorica , Slovenia

Abstract

Abstract Since Janez Janša’s government has been installed, not a day has gone by that the ruling coalition party, SDS (the Slovenian Democratic Party), has not been accused of undermining the freedom of media or threatening media pluralism. Sometimes, critics go even further in condemning Janša as wilfully subordinating media to politics. Regarding subordination, independent media studies from 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008 and lastly 2020 haveclearly indicated that the media in Slovenia are to a certain extent already under the influence of politics, namely those close to the left circles. Whilst scientific conclusions prove the fact that changes in media legislation are more than needed, the question that arises is whether the proposers are looking at the concept of media pluralism from the right perspective. Leaning on the most recent Media landscape research, this article stands out from the rest as it draws parallels with the state of political pluralism, demonstrating how partial and imbalanced covering of news could lead to the domination of one political spectrum. Further, we do a historical review of the right-wing media policy and bring to light those aspects that have undergone the sharpest criticism when it comes to media pluralism. In addition, new ideas for future research are discussed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference71 articles.

1. Adam, Frane and Matevž Tomšič. 2012. ‘The Dynamics of Elites and the Type of Capitalism: Slovenian Exceptionalism?’ Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 37(2): 53–70. Accessed 28.10.21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41636576.

2. Adam, Frane, Matej Makarovič, Matevž Tomšič and Peter Lah. 2006. Nazorski in politični pluralizem v okviru slovenskih tiskanih medijev. Nova revija 293-294: 2-32.

3. Aplenc, Andrej and Janez Jerovšek. 2002. ‘Medijska Konstrukcija Slovenske Realnosti’. Dignitas: revija za človekove pravice 13-14. Ljubljana: Nova revija.

4. Bail, A. Christopher, Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, Haohan Chen, M.B. Fallin Hunzaker, Jaemin Lee, Marcus Mann, Friedolin Merhout and Alexander Volfovsky. 2018. Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (37) 9216-9221. Accessed 31.08.2021. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/37/9216.

5. Barber, Benjamin. 1989. The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3