Affiliation:
1. Kuban State Agrarian University (Russia ), Department of Philosophy , Kuban State Agrarian University , Kalinin St., 13. Krasnodar , 350044 , Russia .
Abstract
Abstract
The article examines the individual and social, practical, and theoretical presumptions (“idols” and “beliefs”) that constitute the conscious and unconscious re-construction of the social reality and reality of different conventional sign systems that represent and are represented by society. It is shown that in everyday life and in theoretical studies, we quite often analyze sign systems as if they were autonomous and empirically “given” realities. The work explains how this “natural belief” originated and developed. It is argued that conventional sign systems cannot be reduced to the reality of material “sign vehicles” because in society, sign systems are both subjective and objective, internal and external, and process and object.
Reference16 articles.
1. [1] Searle, J., 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
2. [2] Sukhoverkhov, A. V., Fowler, C. A., 2015. Why language evolution needs memory: Systems and ecological approaches. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 47–65.10.1007/s12304-014-9202-3
3. [3] Barthes, R., 1972. Mythologies. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Noonday Press.
4. [4] Wheeler, H., 2001. The semiosis of Francis Bacon’s scientific empiricism. Semiotica La Haye Then Berlin, 133(1/4), 45–68.10.1515/semi.2001.009
5. [5] Sukhoverkhov, A. V., 2010. Memory, sign systems, and self-reproductive processes. Biological Theory, 5(2), 161–166.10.1162/BIOT_a_00037
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献