Affiliation:
1. Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences . Charles University . Viničná 7, 12843 Praha 2 , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
Following the conclusions of the previous paper (Uhlir, this issue), this paper adopts a theory that is based on the notion that the essence of language is uniquely human, with no homologue elsewhere in nature, and advances the possibility that human language is discontinuous not only within communication systems but also within representational systems. Linguistic data from disparate sources in Homo sapiens are contrasted with evidence from animals. After briefly discussing the dialectics between the mosaic approach to language and the holistic approach to an integrated left hemisphere, the paper culminates in a proposal of a general zoosemiotic theory of “Representational Systems” and a special anthroposemiotic theory of “Meta-representational Systems”.
Reference206 articles.
1. [1] Harris, R.A., 1995. The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. [2] Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. [3] Chomsky, N., 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
4. [4] Chomsky, N., 1980. Rules and representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
5. [5] Chomsky, N., 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.