Affiliation:
1. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies , Department of Electrical Machines, Transformers and Apparatuses , Skopje , North Macedonia
Abstract
Abstract
Optimisation, or optimal design, has become a fundamental aspect of engineering across various domains, including power devices, power systems, and industrial systems. Engineers and academics have been actively involved in optimising these systems to achieve better performance, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Optimising electrical machines, including permanent magnet motors, is a complex task. It often involves solving intricate problems with various parameters and constraints. Engineers use different optimisation methods to tackle these challenges. Depending on the specific requirements and goals of a design project, engineers may employ either single-objective or multi-objective optimisation approaches. Single-objective optimisation focuses on optimising a single objective, while multi-objective optimisation considers multiple conflicting objectives. In optimisation, objective functions are mathematical representations of what needs to be optimised. In this case, optimising the efficiency of the motor, reducing cogging torque, and minimising the total weight of active materials are defined as possible objective functions. Genetic algorithms are nature based algorithms that are commonly used in engineering to find optimal solutions to complex problems, including those with multiple objectives. In this paper, after conducting optimisations using different objective functions and methods, a comparative analysis of the results is performed. This helps in understanding the trade-offs and benefits of different design choices. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a computational method used to analyse the physical properties and behaviours of complex structures and systems. In this case, FEA is used to validate and analyse selected optimisation solutions to ensure they meet the desired characteristics and parameters. Overall, this work demonstrates the interdisciplinary nature of engineering, where mathematics, computer science (for optimisation algorithms), and physics (for FEA) converge to improve the performance and efficiency of electrical machines. It also underscores the importance of considering multiple objectives in design processes to find optimal solutions that strike a balance between competing goals.
Reference26 articles.
1. Bianchi, N. (2005). Electrical Machine Analysis Using Finite Elements, 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
2. Brisset, S. and Brochet, P. (1998). Optimization of Switched Reluctance Motors Using Deterministic Methods with Static and Dynamic Finite Element Simulations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 34(5), pp. 2853–2856. doi: 10.1109/20.717664.
3. Cvetkovski, G. (2001). Investigation of Methods and Contribution to the Development of Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Disc Motor. PhD. thesis. Skopje: Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, p. 253.
4. Cvetkovski, G. and Petkovska, L. (2008). Efficiency maximisation in structural design optimisation of permanent magnet synchronous motor. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines-ICEM-2008 on CD, Vilamoura, Portugal, 6–9 September 2008, pp. 1–6.
5. Cvetkovski, G. and Petkovska, L. (2010). Specific Power Optimal Design of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Using GA. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny-Organ Stowarzyszenia Elektrykow Polskich, SIGMA-NOT-Wydawnictwo Czasopism Ksiazek Technicznych, 86(12), pp. 24–27.