Affiliation:
1. University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw , Warsaw , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
There is a growing body of research on variability in the early development of biological knowledge. Most of the studies focus on the variability related to culture and direct exposure to nature, however, there is also data suggesting that parental input plays an important role. In children’s first years of life, parents play a key role in scaffolding development. It is therefore very important to provide a detailed account of how parents contribute to children’s understanding of living things, and how they convey biological knowledge through everyday conversations. The present article provides a review of the literature on variability in biological knowledge and parent-child conversations about biological kinds. It also presents original data from parent-child interactions while viewing picture books. Eighteen parent-child dyads who differed in the level of parental expertise within biology, talked while viewing books containing 24 photographs of animals and plants. The speech analysis specified labeling, perceptual and conceptual descriptions, relational, and mentalistic talk. Parents also completed a questionnaire on the child’s interests. The results showed that biology expert families produced more content overall, and a higher proportion of relational content than lay families. The findings help elucidate the specific role parents have in shaping children’s early biological understanding. In particular, I discuss the role of relational language in shaping children’s ontological commitments.
Reference58 articles.
1. Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2008). Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychological Science, 19(4), 314–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02086.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02086.x
2. Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E. A., Carey, S., Ingold, T., & Miller, P. (2004). Constraints on Conceptual Development: A Case Study of the Acquisition of Folkbiological and Folksociological Knowledge in Madagascar. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(3), I-161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3701405
3. Backscheider, A. G., Shatz, M., & Gelman, S. A. (1993). Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish living kinds as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64(4), 1242–1257. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04198.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04198.x
4. Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Coley, J. D. (2002). A bird’s eye view: Biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84(1), 1–53. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00011-210.1016/S0010-0277(02)00011-2
5. Bokus, B. (2000). Światy fabuły w narracji dziecięcej. Warszawa: Energia.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献