Comparative Study Between Conventional and Robotic Methods in 3D Printing
Author:
Hrib Valeriu Fănică1, Chifan Florin1, Dumitraş Cătălin Gabriel1
Affiliation:
1. “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi , Faculty of Machine Manufacturing and Industrial Management , Iaşi , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
The 3D printing is a technology of manufacturing that is now well known. Usually the part is obtain using layer-by-layer deposition and the main inconvenience of this process is that the deposition of material takes place in the plane (2D space) and then it is moved to the next plane by applying a constant increment on the third axis. The accuracy of the product is given by the increment value. The properties of the product, such as strength, also is given by the bond that is made between the layer and the density of the layers. Nowadays, it is proposed a new type of 3D printing using robotic arms. This approach give the possibility to work in 3D space and obtain a 3D defined deposition. It is believed that the properties of the part will be improved together with the mechanical properties of the part. In this article will be presented a comparative study that will indicate the positive and negative aspects of both conventional 3D printing and robotic printing.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference7 articles.
1. Alexandrescu V., Cârţină Gh., Bârlădeanu E., Grigoraş Gh., On the Induction Motor Modeling in Static Analysis of the Power System Voltage Stability, Proc. of the XXIVth Internat. Conf. on Fundam. of Electrot. and Circuit Theory, IC SPETO 2001, Gliwice Uston, Poland, 11, 345-348. 2. Bhatt Prahar M., Kabir Ariyan M., Malhan Rishi K., Shah Brual, Shembekar Aniruddha V., Yeo Jung Yoon, Gupta Satyandra K., A Robotic Cell for Multi-Resolution Additive Manufacturing, International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019, pp. 2800-2807, (2019). 3. Chitariu D.F., Păduraru E., Dogan G., Ilhan M., Negoescu F., Dumitraș C.G., Beznea A., Ștefănescu V., Constantin I., Berbece S., Horodincă M., Experimental Research on Behavior of 3D Printed Gripper Soft Jaws, Mater. Plast., 57 (4), pp. 366-375, (2020). 4. Hongyuan S., Peng Z., Jie L., Chaozong L., Liqiang W., Functional Gradient Metallic Biomaterials: Techniques, Current Scenery, and Future Prospects in the Biomedical Field, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Journal, 8, 1-26, (2020). 5. Jiang J., Newman S.T., Zhong R.Y., A review of multiple degrees of freedom for additive manufacturing machines, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 34(2), 195-211, (2021).
|
|