Affiliation:
1. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University , Vilnius , Lithuania
Abstract
Abstract
Research purpose. The purpose of this study is to single out the tools of creative communication and to identify which of them are most used in the communication of architectural heritage in Vilnius.
Design / Methodology / Approach. Comparative analysis of scientific literature, qualitative expert interviews.
Findings. The communication of the architectural heritage is multifaceted because the heritage is multifunctional. Heritage communication operates through various channels and is focused on different target groups; however, in order for the communication to be effective, as expected, the coherence of communication is required, as well as a comprehensive approach to all aspects of communication. Structured communication is essential for the best communication impact.
Originality / Value / Practical implications. Heritage communication is an actively developing field that is receiving increasing attention from scientists and the public. Much attention is paid to heritage during various cultural events, during which the public has the opportunity to get acquainted with the usually inaccessible heritage or its premises. In this way, the revitalisation of heritage involves urban residents, communities, interested groups who, for cultural, religious or other reasons, are concerned with heritage preservation. Although much attention is paid to heritage communication and sponsors are being attracted, there are fears that the communication of architectural heritage is not sufficient due to the lack of funding for architectural heritage. The consequence of the lack of funding is the disappearance of architectural objects. Thus, the analysis of architectural heritage communication is a relevant and researched topic.
Reference27 articles.
1. Aragón, C., Buxton, J. ir Infield, E. H. (2019). The role of landscape installations in climate change communication. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.014
2. Bernárdez Rodal, A., Padilla Castillo, G. ir Sosa Sánchez, R. P. (2019). From Action Art to Artivism on Instagram: Relocation and instantaneity for a new geography of protest. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.23_1
3. Bitinas, B., Rupšienė, L., & Žydžiūnaitė, V. (2008). Kokybinių tyrimų metodologija [Qualitative Research Methodology]. Klaipėda: S. Jokužio Press.
4. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research strategies. Social Research Methods. (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bräuchler, B. (2019). Brokerage, Creativity and Space: Protest Culture in Indonesia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 40(4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2019.1628721