Distance Between Two Keplerian Orbits

Author:

Mohamed Ayman Homda1,Dwidar Hany Ramdan2,Adham Inal3,Bakry Abd-Elazaz3,El-Raffie Ahmed1

Affiliation:

1. Egyptian Space Agency , Egyptian Space Agency , Egypt

2. Department of Astronomy, Space Science, and Meteorology, Faculty of Science , Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt

3. Astronomy and Meteorology Department, Faculty of Science , Al-Azhar University , Cairo , Egypt

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, constrained minimization for the point of closest approach of two conic sections is developed. For this development, we considered the nine cases of possible conics, namely, (elliptic–elliptic), (elliptic–parabolic), (elliptic–hyperbolic), (parabolic–elliptic), (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), (hyperbolic–elliptic), (hyperbolic–parabolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic). The developments are considered from two points of view, namely, analytical and computational. For the analytical developments, the literal expression of the minimum distance equation (S) and the constraint equation (G), including the first and second derivatives for each case, are established. For the computational developments, we construct an efficient algorithm for calculating the minimum distance by using the Lagrange multiplier method under the constraint on time. Finally, we compute the closest distance S between two conics for some orbits. The accuracy of the solutions was checked under the conditions that L| solution ≤ ɛ1; G| solution ≤ ɛ2, where ɛ1,2 < 10−10. For the cases of (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic), we studied thousands of comets, but the condition of the closest approach was not met.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference14 articles.

1. Alfano S. (1994) Determining satellite close approaches, part 2, JANSC, Vol. 42, No. 2, 143-152.

2. Available from: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?sb_elem#legend

3. Baluyev R.V., Kholshevnikov, K.V. (2005). Distance between two arbitrary unperturbed orbits, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 91, No. 3-4, 287-300.

4. Brown. D.C. (2004) Spacecraft mision desing, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauies, Inc, Washinglon DC, U.S.A. 20024-2.’iIR.

5. Denenberg E., Gurfil, P. (2016) Improvements to time of closest approach calculation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 9, 1967-1979.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3