Comparative Analysis of the Load Spectra Recorded During Photogrammetric Missions of Lightweight Uavs in Tailless and Conventional Configurations
Author:
Mirosław Rodzewicz1ORCID, Dominik Głowacki1ORCID, Jaroslaw Hajduk2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. 1 Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics , Nowowiejska 24 , Warsaw , Poland 2. 2 Air Force Institute of Technology , Księcia Bolesława 6 , Warsaw , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present the results of the investigation regarding the differences of the load spectra of two unmanned fixed-wing aircraft performing photogrammetry missions: X-8 (flying wing) and PW-ZOOM (conventional configuration). The focus was on the analysis of a number of load cycles for various load increments within the range of the operational loads. The load spectra were determined using the acceleration signal recorded in the autopilot logs as an input. This signal was transferred to the chain of local extreme values scaled in the form of discrete load levels, and then the transfer arrays were derived with use of the rainflow counting algorithm. On this basis, the incremental load spectra were determined for each flight. These load spectra were subjected to statistical analyses to determine the load spectra representative of the flight sessions in a few ways between non-conservative (i.e., focused on average load histories) and conservative (i.e., focused on the worst load histories observed during the flight session). Finally, the fatigue life was calculated by having the structural element of the assumed fatigue properties subjected to the load spectra of both airplanes. A large (exceeding one order of magnitude) difference in the number of load cycles for larger load increments in the analyzed load spectra was shown. This difference is related to the different dynamic characteristics of the two aircraft, in particular the gust response. As a result, there is a several-fold difference in fatigue life.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Mechanics of Materials,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Aerospace Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference18 articles.
1. Engineering and Manufacturing Division, Airframe Branch. Fatigue evaluation of wing and associated structure on small airplanes, Report No. AFS-120-73-2, sponsored by Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC 1973. 2. Everaerts, J. (2008). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS) for remote sensing and mapping, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B1, 1187–1191. 3. Giordan, D., Adams, M.S., Aicardi, I., et al. (2020). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for engineering geology applications. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 79, 3437–3481. 4. Głowacki, D., & Rodzewicz, M. (2014). Investigation into Load Spectra of UAVS Aircraft. Fatigue of Aircraft Structures, 2013(5), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2013-0004 5. Goetzendorf-Grabowski, T., & Rodzewicz, M. (2016). Design of UAV for photogrammetric mission in Antarctic area. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 231(9), 1660–1675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016656881
|
|