Deprojectification of agile: The new orthodoxy of long-term product teams

Author:

Nesheim Torstein1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Applied Research at NHH , Bergen , Norway

Abstract

Abstract Agile management thinking has influenced organisations in several ways, but the focus of this paper is on the deprojectification of agile software development. The new agile orthodoxy has been promoted by popular books, in blogs and by Spotify and other firms: agile teams should be aligned to products or domains (not projects); cover development, maintenance and operations (to reduce handover problems); and have a long-term character (to build trust, identity and domain knowledge). We first describe and contextualise the new agile orthodoxy and then, based on an empirical study of two different “agile cases,” we describe and analyse how employees and middle managers perceived the rationale behind the change to long-term teams, how they understood teams as the basic unit of the structure, their perceptions of the resource and disciplinary dimensions of the organisation and the decline of projects and project managers.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Annosi, M.C., Foss, N. and Martini, A. (2020). When Agile harms learning and innovation: (and what can be done about it). California Management Review, 63(1), 61-80.

2. Bakker, R.M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research arena. International Journal of Management Review, 12 (4): 466-468.

3. Beck K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J.A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R., Mellor, S., Schwaberm K., Sutherland, J., and Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile software development. http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed March 25, 2023.

4. Bredin, K. and Engberg, C. (2020). Agile but Fragile? Practices for Sustained Disciplinary Expertise in Project-Based Oranizations. Working paper. Linkøping University.

5. Barton, D., Carey, D. and Charan, R. (2018). One bank’s Agile experiment: How ING revamped its retail operation. Harvard Business Review, 96 (2): 59-61.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3