Abstract
Abstract
Although Poland’s energy mix is becoming ‘greener’ each year, the coun‑ try’s energy production is still dominated by coal. This affects several important spheres: financial, socioeconomic and political. Therefore, the aim of the article is to explain Poland’s response to adaptational pressure stemming from the European Green Deal (EGD) by reconstructing discursive strategies related to the topics of decarbonisa‑ tion and green transformation. We perceive the EGD as a regulatory initiative, whose purpose is to incorporate formal rules and European norms in the domestic discourse and public policies. In order to induce such a change, the European Commission influ‑ ences the ‘utility calculations’ used by member states. However, at the same time, some member states need to deal with problems caused by misfits between their energy sector’s capabilities and expectations of the EGD. In Poland’s case, the significant fields of misfits refer to national emission targets, obligations resulting from the EU Emis‑ sion Trading System and the Fit for 55 reform package. Using discourse analysis, we have reconstructed a governmental narrative on the transformation based on elec‑ tion manifestos, selected ministerial documents and social media posts from the years 2019–2021. As the government aims to present itself as defenders of Polish national interests, climate‑related policies are seen as a threat. There is a clear focus on energy sovereignty and security issues, while challenges related to global warming are absent from the political communication. As the situation at the Belarussian border developed and the danger connected with Russian politics became clearer, the concept of being a defender acquired more meanings.
Reference70 articles.
1. Biedenkopf, K. (2021): Polish Climate Policy Narratives: Uniqueness, Alternative Pathways, and Nascent Polarisation. Politics and Governance 9(3): 391–400, available at https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4349.
2. Bongardt, A. – Torres, F (2022): The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic Crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model*. JCMS: Jour‑ nal of Common Market Studies 60(1): 170–85, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13264.
3. Börzel, T. A. – Risse, T. (2000): When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4(15).
4. Bulmer, S. J. –Radaelli, C. M. (2004): The Europeanisation of National Policy? Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation. Queens University Belfast.
5. Chestney, N. – Abnett, K. –Twidale, S. (2022): Europe’s Carbon Price Nears the 100 € Milestone. Reuters (February 6).