Poland’s Governmental Response to the European Green Deal: Discursive Strategies prior to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in February 2022

Author:

Dulak MichałORCID,Kułakowska MałgorzataORCID

Abstract

Abstract Although Poland’s energy mix is becoming ‘greener’ each year, the coun‑ try’s energy production is still dominated by coal. This affects several important spheres: financial, socioeconomic and political. Therefore, the aim of the article is to explain Poland’s response to adaptational pressure stemming from the European Green Deal (EGD) by reconstructing discursive strategies related to the topics of decarbonisa‑ tion and green transformation. We perceive the EGD as a regulatory initiative, whose purpose is to incorporate formal rules and European norms in the domestic discourse and public policies. In order to induce such a change, the European Commission influ‑ ences the ‘utility calculations’ used by member states. However, at the same time, some member states need to deal with problems caused by misfits between their energy sector’s capabilities and expectations of the EGD. In Poland’s case, the significant fields of misfits refer to national emission targets, obligations resulting from the EU Emis‑ sion Trading System and the Fit for 55 reform package. Using discourse analysis, we have reconstructed a governmental narrative on the transformation based on elec‑ tion manifestos, selected ministerial documents and social media posts from the years 2019–2021. As the government aims to present itself as defenders of Polish national interests, climate‑related policies are seen as a threat. There is a clear focus on energy sovereignty and security issues, while challenges related to global warming are absent from the political communication. As the situation at the Belarussian border developed and the danger connected with Russian politics became clearer, the concept of being a defender acquired more meanings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference70 articles.

1. Biedenkopf, K. (2021): Polish Climate Policy Narratives: Uniqueness, Alternative Pathways, and Nascent Polarisation. Politics and Governance 9(3): 391–400, available at https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4349.

2. Bongardt, A. – Torres, F (2022): The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic Crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model*. JCMS: Jour‑ nal of Common Market Studies 60(1): 170–85, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13264.

3. Börzel, T. A. – Risse, T. (2000): When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4(15).

4. Bulmer, S. J. –Radaelli, C. M. (2004): The Europeanisation of National Policy? Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation. Queens University Belfast.

5. Chestney, N. – Abnett, K. –Twidale, S. (2022): Europe’s Carbon Price Nears the 100 € Milestone. Reuters (February 6).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3