Legal changes of the decision not to initiate a proceeding in the Albanian criminal procedure code, their implementation in practice

Author:

Miha Elsa1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Prosecutor at the General Jurisdiction Prosecutor’s Office of Tirana

Abstract

Abstract The Prosecutor’s Office is the only constitutional body that carries out criminal prosecution, when it becomes aware of a criminal offense.1 Within the framework of the exercise of this constitutional right, when it becomes aware of a criminal offense, it must not necessarily pursue criminal prosecution. In all cases where it verifies that at first sight, or prima facie, there are legal reasons that prevent it from pursuing criminal prosecution, such as the cases: when the fact does not constitute a criminal offense, the criminal fact does not exist, the suspect dies, there are reasons for impunity related to the offense and the author, or in all other cases provided for in the law, the prosecution takes the decision not to initiate criminal proceedings.2 The prosecution takes the decision not to initiate criminal proceedings, when prima facie, it is clear that there is no criminal offense, or there are circumstances that do not allow the criminal proceedings to continue and investigative actions to be carried out. Given the nature of this decision, in which the prosecutor’s office only verifies and does not carry out investigative actions, the prosecutor’s decision must be quick. With the changes made to Article 291 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the decision not to initiate criminal proceedings must be taken within 15 days from the moment of registration of the criminal report and not within 30 days as it was before the changes in 2017. This time change seems to be in accordance with the nature of this decision, since its taking has only verification and not investigative reasons. But how has this deadline been implemented in practice? What are the consequences of not respecting this deadline, in relation to the decision made? All of these will be part of the analysis of this manuscript.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference14 articles.

1. Constitution of the Republic of Albania, law no. 8417, dt. 21.10.1998.

2. Constitution of the Republic of Albania, law no. 8417, dt. 21.10.1998, amended.

3. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Albania, amended.

4. Decision no. 2/2013 of the United Colleges of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Albania.

5. Decision no. 104 dated 30.03.2023, of the Supreme Court.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Problems on legal qualification of criminal offense during precautionary measures;Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences;2024-07-01

2. The change in the legal classification of the criminal offense and the right to defense in the trial;Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences;2024-07-01

3. Electronic evidence in the criminal process;Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences;2024-07-01

4. Limitation of the right to appeal against the decision to take the case to court;European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences;2024-06-01

5. Criminal offenses in the field of Cybernetics related to computer - Computer forgery and computer fraud;European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences;2024-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3