Affiliation:
1. Institute of Polish Language , Polish Academy of Sciences , Kraków
Abstract
Abstract
The article deals with the origin of the Proto-Indo-European comparative suffix. It is claimed that the morpheme in question, reconstructed here as *-i̯ōs < *-i̯o-os, evolved in predicatively used *-s-stem nominals. It is also claimed that the first component of the complex *-i̯o-os is the allomorph *-i̯o- of the verbal suffix *-i̯e/o-. Both intrasystemic and typological parallels indicate that the verbal component could originate from intransitive change-of-state verbs. It is suggested that the ablaut varieties of the comparative suffix and the frequent predesinential extensions are due to independent inflectionalization in various post-Proto-Indo-European dialects.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference81 articles.
1. Adams, Douglas Quentin. 2013. A Dictionary of Tocharian B. Revised and Greatly Enlarged. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
2. Andersen, Paul Kent. 1980. On the reconstruction of the syntax of comparison in PIE. In Ramat, Paolo & Ramat, Anna Giacalone & Graffi, Giorgio, Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax, 225-236. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
3. Andersen, Paul Kent. 1983. Word Order Typology and Comparative Constructions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
4. Barber, Peter Jeffrey. 2013. Sievers’ Law and the History of Semivowel Syllabicity in Indo-European and Ancient Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Beekes, Robert. 1985. The Origins of the Indo-European Nominal Inflection. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The rise of gemination in Celtic;Open Research Europe;2024-02-08
2. The rise of gemination in Celtic;Open Research Europe;2023-02-02