Political Regime and Governance on climate Change. Evidence from the Western Balkan Economies
Author:
Triarchi Eirini1, Kolias Dimitrios2, Karamanis Kostas3
Affiliation:
1. Lecturer, Department of Accounting and Finance , University of Ioannina, University of Ioannina, Hellenic Open University , Greece 2. Researcher, School of Social Sciences , Hellenic Open University , Greece 3. Professor, Department of Accounting and Finance , University of Ioannina, University of Ioannina, Hellenic Open University , Greece
Abstract
Abstract
The political environment plays a crucial role in steering societies to address the challenges posed by global warming and contributing to global initiatives toward a resilient and environmentally sustainable future. Political regimes in different places in the democracy-authoritarianism spectrum show varying degrees of effort to reduce their nation's respective carbon emissions. This paper aims to determine the role of political regimes along with governance dimensions in climate change mitigation. The analysis uses the V-Dem database and the World Governance Indicators (WGI) to conceptualise and measure each country's political system and its institutional quality of governance, respectively. The empirical model uses a panel database of the variables of interest for the years 1998-2022 regarding the Western Balkan (WB) economies. The target group of countries sparks our interest due to their significant challenges, such as widespread pollution, political regime changes, and severe governance problems. Furthermore, integrating the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, which suggests a complex relationship between economic growth and environmental sustainability, the analysis provides evidence that the relationship between CO2 emissions and GDP per capita follows a quadratic trend, suggesting that as GDP per capita increases, the associated CO2 emissions may not change linearly but instead follow a parabolic pattern. WB countries also share the ambition of EU accession and hold the EU candidate status. To the extent these states manage to overcome their institutional issues, they will be in the position to implement the EU environmental acquis efficiently, which will amount to a critical step in the region's environmental health. Policymakers and scholars of the field will benefit from this paper since it determines the impact of political systems precisely matched with empirical results to derive conclusive answers regarding the political systems and climate change debate.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference63 articles.
1. Alfthan, B., Krilasevic, E., Venturini, S., Bajrovic, S., Jurek, M., Schoolmeester, T., Sandei, P. C., Egerer, H., & Kurvits, T. (2015). Mountain Adaptation Outlook Series: Outlook on Climate Change Adaptation in the Western Balkan Mountains (United Nat). GRID-Arendal and Environmental Innovations Association. https://www.grida.no/publications/162 2. Alola, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890 3. Banja, M., Đukanović, G., & Belis, C. A. (2020). Status of air pollutants and greenhouse gases in the Western Balkans -Benchmarking the accession process progress on environment. https://doi.org/10.2760/48321 4. Bättig, M. B., & Bernauer, T. (2009). National institutions and global public goods: Are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? International Organization, 63(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090092 5. Beeson, M. (2016). Environmental Authoritarianism and China. In T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory (Issue November 2018, pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.013.14
|
|