Modern Approaches in Credit Risk Modeling: A Literature Review
Author:
Rogojan Luana Cristina1, Croicu Andreea Elena2, Iancu Laura Andreea3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest, Romania Institute for Economic Forecasting , Bucharest , Romania 2. 2 Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest, Romania Institute for Economic Forecasting , Bucharest , Romania 3. 3 Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest, Romania Institute for Economic Forecasting , Bucharest , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
In the financial industry, models are pervasive, and their quantity and complexity continue to increase. Constant advancements are made in econometric and statistical theory, but a fast-developing body of rules and regulations governing their use needs modeling specialists to remain vigilant and adaptable. The tendency of these regulations to be ambiguous necessitates that industry professionals and institutions interpret them independently and jointly. This leads in what is referred to as a “industry standard,” or a set of procedures that are recognized among modeling professionals but not necessarily to those outside of the industry. Non-practitioners in the industry may view the modeling department as a “black box” for these reasons. The accurate evaluation of financial credit risk and the forecasting of bankruptcy are crucial to both the economy and society. In recent years, more and more approaches and algorithms have been advanced for this purpose. At this point, it is of the highest concern to investigate the current credit risk assessment methods. In this paper, we review the traditional statistical models and cutting-edge intelligent methods for forecasting financial distress, with a focus on the greatest advances in the academic literature, as the promising trend in this field. Lastly, the paper will conclude with an overview of the evolution of methodologies and conceptual frameworks in credit risk management research, as well as possible future research directions.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference8 articles.
1. Capotorti, A., & Barbanera, E. (2012). Credit scoring analysis using a fuzzy probabilistic rough set model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56(4), 981-994. 2. Chen, N., Ribeiro, B., & Chen, A. (2016). Financial credit risk assessment: a recent review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 45(1), 1-23. 3. Li, Z., Tian, Y., Li, K., Zhou, F., & Yang, W. (2017). Reject inference in credit scoring using semi-supervised support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications, 74, 105-114. 4. Shi, S., Tse, R., Luo, W., D’Addona, S., & Pau, G. (2022). Machine learning-driven credit risk: a systemic review. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(17), 14327-14339. 5. Uddin, M. S., Chi, G., Al Janabi, M. A., & Habib, T. (2022). Leveraging random forest in micro‐ enterprises credit risk modelling for accuracy and interpretability. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3713-3729.
|
|