Bertrand competition under asymmetric conditions

Author:

Vintila Alexandra1,Roman Mihai Daniel1

Affiliation:

1. Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Analyzing price competition through game theory is one of the most important frameworks of oligopoly theory, especially in industrial organizations. Numerous studies have been conducted in this direction, as companies are forced to adjust their sustainable pricing policy to operate in the long term. Thus, the players make a regular adjustment of the pricing strategy. Of all the models developed based on Bertrand’s reference model (1883), the most analyzed were those in which informational symmetry predominated. Since informational symmetry presents only a theoretical framework, economists have turned their attention to information asymmetry. This type of information best describes a complex economic game, as it creates an information gap between players and generates opportunities in the decision-making process. Thus, asymmetric information is the main parameter of the decision-making process that determines decision makers to resort to different decision strategies than those assumed by the analytical model. Any asymmetric Bertrand model predicts competitive and efficient market outcomes, a direct relationship between a firm’s conduct, market structure and finally market performance. This paper undertakes an analysis of the Bertrand model in the case of demand and asymmetric costs. We determine the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium under the scenario in which close, but not perfect substitutes exist for the differentiated product with hypothetical data. Then we highlight what happens with profits when we consider that discrete cross marginal demand gradually increases. For more research, there are numerous studies based on sequential games, Bayesian games and signaling games both in discrete time and in continuous time.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference25 articles.

1. Achstatter, G.A. (1996). Let game theory begin: Anticipating your rival, Investor’s Business Daily, January 25, 1996.

2. Aoyagi, M. (2018). Bertrand competition under network externalities, Journal of Economic Theory, 178(C), 517-550.10.1016/j.jet.2018.10.006

3. Aumann, R. J. (1987). Correlated equilibrium as an expression of bayesian rationality, Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(1), 1-18.10.2307/1911154

4. Bertrand, J. (1883). Review of Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale and Recherches sur les Principles Mathématique de la Théorie des Richesses, Journal des Savants, 499-508.

5. Blume, A. (2003). Bertrand without Fudge, Economics Letters, 78(2), 167-168.10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00217-3

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3