Affiliation:
1. Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
Analyzing price competition through game theory is one of the most important frameworks of oligopoly theory, especially in industrial organizations. Numerous studies have been conducted in this direction, as companies are forced to adjust their sustainable pricing policy to operate in the long term. Thus, the players make a regular adjustment of the pricing strategy. Of all the models developed based on Bertrand’s reference model (1883), the most analyzed were those in which informational symmetry predominated. Since informational symmetry presents only a theoretical framework, economists have turned their attention to information asymmetry. This type of information best describes a complex economic game, as it creates an information gap between players and generates opportunities in the decision-making process. Thus, asymmetric information is the main parameter of the decision-making process that determines decision makers to resort to different decision strategies than those assumed by the analytical model. Any asymmetric Bertrand model predicts competitive and efficient market outcomes, a direct relationship between a firm’s conduct, market structure and finally market performance. This paper undertakes an analysis of the Bertrand model in the case of demand and asymmetric costs. We determine the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium under the scenario in which close, but not perfect substitutes exist for the differentiated product with hypothetical data. Then we highlight what happens with profits when we consider that discrete cross marginal demand gradually increases. For more research, there are numerous studies based on sequential games, Bayesian games and signaling games both in discrete time and in continuous time.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference25 articles.
1. Achstatter, G.A. (1996). Let game theory begin: Anticipating your rival, Investor’s Business Daily, January 25, 1996.
2. Aoyagi, M. (2018). Bertrand competition under network externalities, Journal of Economic Theory, 178(C), 517-550.10.1016/j.jet.2018.10.006
3. Aumann, R. J. (1987). Correlated equilibrium as an expression of bayesian rationality, Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(1), 1-18.10.2307/1911154
4. Bertrand, J. (1883). Review of Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale and Recherches sur les Principles Mathématique de la Théorie des Richesses, Journal des Savants, 499-508.
5. Blume, A. (2003). Bertrand without Fudge, Economics Letters, 78(2), 167-168.10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00217-3