Ensuring the Child's Right to Communication With Both Parents in the Context of Parental Divorce: A Lithuanian Case Study

Author:

Kairienė Brigita1,Valackienė Asta1,Blauzdžiūnaitė-Pavlovič Jolanta1

Affiliation:

1. Mykolas Romeris University , Vilnius , Lithuania

Abstract

Abstract Reflecting on the Sustainable Development Agenda 2030, which emphasises that progress in sustainable development depends on ensuring prosperity, and in line with the Sustainable Development Goal 3, which aims to promote the well-being of all age groups, including children, this study aims to examine the child's legitimate right to communicate with both parents in the context of divorce and support arrangements. Filling the gaps in previous research, our research problem is focused on analysing the impact on sustainability, the child's emotional well-being and the protection of the child's rights in the situation of parental divorce. Following the emergent approach, an instrumental case study design and a qualitative research strategy were employed using methods such as content analysis of legal documents and semi-structured interviews. The research questions addressed two dimensions of the analysis: the factors contributing to the exercise of the child's right to communicate with the separated parent; and violations of the child's rights where the child's right to communicate with both parents is not properly ensured or not at all ensured. The results of this study reveal that the parent living with the child after the divorce acts contrary to the best interests of the child, denying the child's inherent right to be raised and educated by both parents.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education

Reference41 articles.

1. Albertini, M., & Garriga, A. (2011). The effect of divorce on parent-child contacts. European Societies, 13(2), 257–278. https://doi-org.skaitykla.mruni.eu/10.1080/14616696.2010.48300210.1080/14616696.2010.483002

2. Auckland, C., & Imogen Goold, I. (2019). Parental rights, best interests and significant harms. Who should have the final say over a child's medical care? Cambridge Law Journal, 78, 287–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819731900038210.1017/S0008197319000382

3. Burns, H., Diamond-Vaught, H., & Bauman, C. (2015). Leadership for sustainability: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical practices that foster change. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 130–144. https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol9iss1/IJLSvol9iss1.pdf

4. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT

5. Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. (2000). Valstybės žinios, 2000-09-06, No. 74-2262, current version 2022-06-01 – 2022-06-30.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3