Hermeneutics and its New Tendencies: to the Question of Aesthetic Paradigm Change

Author:

Shcherbak N. F.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg State University

Abstract

Introduction. The work examines the main vector of development of contemporary literary and hermeneutics studies. The main aim is to show how the view of the text has changed and what are the important tools in the process of its interpretation.Methodology and sources. Firstly, various philosophical and literary approaches to texts are considered. One of the main ideas behind the research method is the comparison of the modernist, post-modernist and meta-modernist paradigm in the process of text interpretation. Another important aspect is the consideration of symptomatic and surface reading, as an important tool in the discussion of whether the text bears any meaning apart from the directly deducable and what is the most contemporary if not the best way of interpreting it. Most texts analyzed are literary examples, mainly taken from Anglophone literature.Results and discussion. The results of the research state a number of tendencies in the view of contemporary hermeneutics. Among the general conclusion of the shift from modernist to post-modern and meta-modern patterns in the narrative. Regarding the process of text interpretation what is stated is a general tendency to see the surface l evel of the text as bearing all the necessary and important meanings. The older and more conservative approach of bringing meaning into the text is also at work, depending on the traditions. Elimination of text interpretation (or denying it its original im portance) is also an important point of view, as it states that a literary text explains more than any supporting attempt of its explanation. Another important feature is a tendency of a modern literary text to adopt characteristics of poetry. The psychoanalytic view is competing with post-modernist or meta-modernist view.Conclusion. Metamodernist tendency, surface reading and attention to the literary text itself, and not its further explanation seems to be the core of a contemporary view of literary texts, their interpretation and, hense, meaning.

Publisher

St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETI

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference21 articles.

1. Hassan, I. (1987), “Toward a Concept of Postmodernism”, The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture, Ohio State Univ. Press, Columbus, USA, pp. 84–96.

2. Deleuze, G. (1998), Razlichie i povtorenie [Différence et Répétition], Transl. by Man’kovskaya, N.B., Yurovskaya, E.P., Petropolis, SPb., RUS.

3. Vermeulen, Т. and van den Akker, R. (2010), “Notes on Metamodernism”, Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

4. Groys, B. (2015), O novom. Opyt ekonomiki kul’tury [Über das Neue. Versuh einer Kulturökonomie], Transl. by Zborovskaya, T., Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, RUS.

5. Khrushcheva, N.A. (2020), Metamodernizm v muzyke i vokrug nee [Metamodernism in and around music], Ripol-classic, Moscow, RUS.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3