Affiliation:
1. Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"
2. Space Research Institute of the RAS
3. Mozyr State Pedagogical University named after I. P. Shamyakin
Abstract
Introduction. Acousto-optic spectrum analyzers interferometric schemes have been developed to increase dynamic range. It was assumed that dynamic range, expressed in dB, would double. An expected increase was not achieved yet.Aim. To analyze the homodyne acousto-optic spectrum analyzer noise characteristics, to estimate the signal-tonoise ratio and the dynamic range.Materials and methods.A mathematical model was compiled which took into account the need to form quadrature components to obtain an amplitude spectrum of an input signal, shot noise and readout noise.Results. An interferometric scheme did not allow to achieve dynamic range doubling compared to an acoustooptical power spectrum analyzer. The dynamic range increase was less than 1.35 dB. Constant illumination led to a significant increase of the spectrum analyzer self-noise due to shot noise, compared to which thermal noise and readout noise became insignificant. The spurious-free dynamic range estimation expression was obtained. It was prior determined by acousto-optic interaction nonlinearity. With typical analyzer blocks parameters the spurious-free dynamic range covered a single-signal dynamic range. Signal-to-noise ratio estimation expression was presented.Conclusion. The homodyne acousto-optic spectrum analyzer single-signal dynamic range is determined primarily by the photosensor saturation charge. One needs to optimize their relation by taking into account light source power, acousto-optical modulator diffraction efficiency and photosensor saturation charge. Presented noise model gives more accurate estimation of the dynamic range with an error of 1 dB.
Publisher
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETI
Reference15 articles.
1. Olbrich M., Mittenzwei V., Siebertz O., Schmulling F., Schieder R. A 3 GHz Instantaneous Bandwidth AcoustoOptical Spectrometer with 1 MHz Resolution. Proc. of 18th Intern. Symp. on Space Terahertz Technology, 21–23 March 2007, Pasadena, California, pp. 231–235. Available at: https://hobbydocbox.com/Radio/95227070-A-3-ghz-instantaneous-bandwidth-acousto-optical-spectrometer-with-1- mhz-resolution.html (accessed 16.01.2020).
2. Siebertz O., Schieder R., Gal C., Olbrich M., Hartogh P. Acousto-Optical Spectrometers for THz Heterodyne Instruments. Proc. SPIE. 4857, 2003, vol. 56.
3. Vander Lugt A. Interferometric Spectrum Analyzer. App. Opt. 1981, vol. 20, iss. 16, pp. 2770–2779. doi: 10.1364/AO.20.002770
4. Wiley W. A., Gatenby P. V. Theoretical Study of the interferometric Bragg-cell Spectrum Analyzer. IEE Proc. J. Optoelectronics. 1986, vol. 133, iss. 1, pp. 47–59. doi: 10.1049/ip-j.1986.0007
5. Tinoco A. F. S., Perrella W. J., Alves F. D. P., Oliveira J. E. B. Computer aided Design of Bragg Cell Spectrum Analyzer. Proc. of the 2001 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S Intern. Microwave and Optoelectronics Conf. Belem, Brazil, Brazil, 6–10 Aug. 2001, vol. 1, pp. 13–16. doi: 10.1109/SBMOMO.2001.1008708