1. Baresi, L. and Pezz’e, M., Formal Interpreters for Diagram Notations, ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodology, 2005, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 42–84.
2. Engels, G., Heckel, R., and Küster, J.M., Rule-Based Specification of Behavioral Consistency Based on the UML Meta-Model, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2001, vol. 2185, pp. 272–287. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/engels01rulebased.html .
3. Minas, M., Creating Semantic Representations of Diagrams, Proc. Int. Workshop Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE’99), Monastery Rolduc, the Netherlands, 1999, pp. 209–224.
4. Sharov, O.G. and Afanas’ev, A.N., Automaton Graphical Grammar, Vestn. Ul’yanovskogo Gos. Tekh. Univ. (Herald Ul’yanovsk State Tech. Univ.), 2005, no. 1, pp. 54–56.
5. Sharov, O.G. and Afanas’ev, A.N., Syntax-Directed Implementation of Visual Languages Based on Automaton Graphical Grammars, Programmirovanie, 2005, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 56–66 [Programming Comput. Software (Engl. Transl.), 2005, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 332–339].