Author:
Shilovsky Gregory A.,Putyatina Tatyana S.,Markov Alexander V.
Abstract
AbstractFrom the evolutionary point of view, the priority problem for an individual is not longevity, but adaptation to the environment associated with the need for survival, food supply, and reproduction. We see two main vectors in the evolution of mammals. One is a short lifespan and numerous offspring ensuring reproductive success (r-strategy). The other one is development of valuable skills in order compete successfully (K-strategy). Species with the K-strategy should develop and enhance specific systems (anti-aging programs) aimed at increasing the reliability and adaptability, including lifespan. These systems are signaling cascades that provide cell repair and antioxidant defense. Hence, any arbitrarily selected long-living species should be characterized by manifestation to a different extent of the longevity-favoring traits (e.g., body size, brain development, sociality, activity of body repair and antioxidant defense systems, resistance to xenobiotics and tumor formation, presence of neotenic traits). Hereafter, we will call a set of such traits as the gerontological success of a species. Longevity is not equivalent to the evolutionary or reproductive success. This difference between these phenomena reaches its peak in mammals due to the development of endothermy and cephalization associated with the cerebral cortex expansion, which leads to the upregulated production of oxidative radicals by the mitochondria (and, consequently, accelerated aging), increase in the number of non-dividing differentiated cells, accumulation of the age-related damage in these cells, and development of neurodegenerative diseases. The article presents mathematical indicators used to assess the predisposition to longevity in different species (including the standard mortality rate and basal metabolic rate, as well as their derivatives). The properties of the evolution of mammals (including the differences between modern mammals and their ancestral forms) are also discussed.
Subject
Biochemistry,General Medicine,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Biophysics,Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference106 articles.
1. Skulachev, V. P. (1997) Aging is a specific biological function rather than the result of a disorder in complex living systems: biochemical evidence in support of Weismann’s hypothesis, Biochemistry (Moscow), 62, 1191-1195.
2. Skulachev, M. V., and Skulachev, V. P. (2014) New data on programmed aging – slow phenoptosis, Biochemistry (Moscow), 79, 977-993, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297914100010.
3. Austad, S. N., and Fischer, K. E. (1991) Mammalian aging, metabolism, and ecology: evidence from bats and marsupials, J. Gerontol., 46, 47-53, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.2.b47.
4. Austad, S. N. (1997) Why We Age, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Harman, D. (1972) The biologic clock: the mitochondria? J. Am. Ger. Soc., 20, 145-147, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1972.tb00787.x.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献