Abstract
Abstract
The methods and tools used by the European Union to counter hybrid threats are identified: from the fight against terrorism to measures aimed at combating economic competitors and political opponents (mainly, to squeeze Russia and China out of European markets). It is concluded that it is not by chance that neither EU institutions nor the research community have worked out a comprehensive definition of operations to combat hybrid threats. A broad understanding of hybrid threats as practically any (depending on the political situation) actions of the opponent serves to justify the application of any counteraction tool. In the fight against global threats such as terrorism, cybercrime, and the spread of false medical data, the EU takes a systemic approach, which makes it possible to assess the level and degree of the convergence of threats to critical infrastructure and the infosphere, as well as the possibilities of counteraction. At the same time, attempts to use economic, legislative, political, and informational tools to achieve one-sided economic, political, and military advantages do not reduce the degree of tension in the EU’s relations with Russia, China, and some other countries, only increasing the number and strength of hybrid threats. This reduces the EU’s ability to achieve strategic autonomy.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Cultural Studies
Reference17 articles.
1. Alenius K. (2021) Asylum Seekers from Russia to Finland: A Hybrid Operation by Chance? in: Eze Th., Speakman L., Onwubiko S. (eds.) Proceeding of the 20th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ECCWS 2021, pp. 11–17, Academic Conferences International Limited, Reading, UK. https://doi.org/10.34190/EWS.21.069
2. Biscop S. (2021) The EU and China: Sanctions, Signals, and Interests. Security Policy Brief No. 145, May. EGMONT—Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels, Belgium. URL: https://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2021/05/SPB145-revised.pdf?type=pdf (accessed: 07.12.2021).
3. Caldwell M., Andrews J., Tanay T., and Griffin L. (2020) AI-enabled future crime. Crime Science. Vol. 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00123-8
4. Introduction;E. Cusumano,2018
5. Danilov D.A. (2021) Global’nye gorizonty atlanticheskogo al’yansa: “vakcina” Bajdena. [Global Horizons of the Atlantic Alliance: the Biden “Vaccine”], Sovremennaya Evropa, No. 5, pp. 19–31, (In Russian).https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520211931
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献