Maps of Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential in the Russian Croplands-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Maps of Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential in the Russian Croplands

Published:2024-05 Issue:5 Volume:57 Page:737-750
ISSN:1064-2293
Container-title:Eurasian Soil Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Eurasian Soil Sc.

Author:

Romanenkov V. A.,Meshalkina J. L.,Gorbacheva A. Yu.,Krenke A. N.,Petrov I. K.,Golozubov O. M.,Rukhovich D. I.

Abstract

Abstract Adoption of the farming systems that aim to sequester carbon in agricultural soils is one of the ways to mitigate global climate change. This study focuses on the estimation of organic carbon sequestration potential of the Russian croplands in the upper (0–30 cm) soil layer by creating a set of maps using the data from global and national databases as the input data. The maps are generated within the FAO Global Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential Map (GSOCseq) project according to the unified methodology using the RothC model to predict the rate of carbon sequestration in 2020–2040 under a business as usual scenario (BAU), as well as under sustainable soil management scenarios with additional different C input (+5, +10, and +20%) resulting from the use of sustainable soil management (SSM) scenarios. The total potential sequestration rate by the croplands of the Russian Federation in the 0–30-cm layer under a BAU scenario is assessed at 8.5 Mt/year and the estimate under SSM scenarios, up to 25.5 Mt/year. The carbon sequestration by the cropland of each soil ecological zone (except for the light chestnut (Eutric Cambisols (Protocalcic)) and brown semidesert (Luvic Calcisols) soils, where it is around zero) and on a national scale is positive. The Altai krai, Omsk oblast, Novosibirsk oblast, and Krasnoyarsk krai have the greatest potential for sequestration. Several subjects of the Russian Federation—Krasnodar krai, Republic of Crimea, Rostov oblast, Primorskii krai, Republic of Adygea, and Kaliningrad oblast—demand the adoption of sustainable management of soil resources.

Publisher

Pleiades Publishing Ltd

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S106422932360375X.pdf

Reference28 articles.

1. I. V. Glushkov, V. Lupachik, A. V. Prishchepov, P. V. Potapov, M. Yu. Pukinskaya, A. Yu. Yaroshenko, and I. V. Zhuravleva, “Mapping abandoned land in eastern Europe using Landsat and Google Earth Engine satellite imagery,” in Modern Vegetation Science: Proceedings of Scientific Conference (Moscow, 2019), pp. 35–37.

2. A. L. Ivanov and V. S. Stolbovoi, “"4 ppm” initiative is a new global challenge for Russian soils," Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva 98, 185–202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2019-98-185-202

3. A. N. Krenke, “Identification of invariant states of agricultural landscapes based on hierarchical factor analysis of remote information,” Prints. Ekol., No. 3, 16–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15393/j1.art.2020.10942

4. V. N. Kudeyarov, “Role of soils in the carbon cycle,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 915–923 (2005).

5. V. A. Romanenkov, O. D. Sirotenko, D. I. Rukhovich, I. A. Romanenko, L. K. Shevtsova, and P. V. Koroleva, Forecast of the Dynamics of Organic Carbon Reserves of Arable Lands in the European Territory of Russia (VNIIA, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].