Abstract
This paper critically reviews the current building seismic design approach based on the observed performance of modern building stock in recent earthquakes, highlights the inability of the current design approach in controlling seismic damage and losses, and proposes a conceptual framework for next generation seismic design codes that is likely to meet public expectations. In addition to ensuring life-safety in rare earthquakes, the proposed loss-optimization seismic design approach also aims to ensure quick functional recovery and minimum loss (i.e. repair, downtime, and injury/fatality) in moderate-strong earthquakes by limiting damage to building’s structural and non-structural components. Based on comparison of performances of building stock in some recent major earthquakes in different countries, the paper presents some simple strategies to render buildings more resilient and suffer significantly less seismic damage (and consequentially incur less loss). Finally, the paper scrutinizes the efficacy of some commonly used low-damage technologies in minimizing building seismic losses.
Publisher
New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
Reference70 articles.
1. Dhakal RP (2020). “Editorial: Seismic performance of non-structural elements (SPONSE) and Learning from earthquakes (LFE): NZ perspective”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 53(3): 113-115. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.53.3.113-115
2. Dhakal RP, Pourali A, Tasligedik S, Yeow T, Baird A, MacRae G, Pampanin S and Palermo A (2016). “Seismic performance of non-structural components and contents in buildings: An overview of NZ research”. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0301-9
3. Dhakal RP, Rashid M, Bhatta J, Chen C, Song GQ, Sullivan TJ, MacRae GA, Clifton GC, Xiang P and Jia LJ (2020). “Shake table testing plan for multiple non-structural elements and contents in a low–damage structural steel building”. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), September 27-2 October 2021, Sendai, Japan, 12 pp.
4. Rashid M, Dhakal RP and Sullivan TJ (2021). “Seismic design of acceleration-sensitive non-structural elements in New Zealand: State-of-practice and recommended changes”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 54(4): 243-262. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.54.4.243-262
5. Arifin F, Sullivan TJ and Dhakal RP (2020). “Experimental investigation into the seismic fragility of a commercial glazing system”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 53(3): 144-149. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.53.3.144-149