Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to assess co-parenting research through bibliometric analysis. The documents under evaluationwere sourced from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Initially, 473 studies were were retrieved using keyword "co-parenting". Subsequently, after applying exclusion criteria, a comprehensive bibliometric and content analysis was conducted on the remaining 421 articles. These studies were classified and visually represented based on their characteristics. It was determined that the studies evaluated within the scope of the study were conducted between 1981 and 2023. The analysis revealed that the author with the highest number of publications was O. Cohen and the most productive institution was "University of Toronto". Co-parenting, divorce, parenting, and fathers emerged as the most frequently recurring keywords through co-keyword analysis. Furthermore, the study titled "The internal structure and ecological context of co-parenting: A framework for research and intervention" was identified as the most cited study through co-reference analysis. The study concludes that Paul R. Amato was the most influential author in the co-citation analysis, while Marsha Kline Pruett was the most influential author in the co-author analysis.
Publisher
Research on Education and Psychology
Reference71 articles.
1. Akın. S., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2021). Hasta memnuniyeti kavramının bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi [Examining patient satisfaction concept with bibliometric analysis method]. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi [Journal of Helath Academics], 8(1), 71-84. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sagakaderg/issue/60517/863795
2. Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children, 15(2), 75-96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3556564
3. Antunes, N., Vieira-Santos, S., Roberto, M. S., Francisco, R., Pedro, M. F., & Ribeiro, M. T. (2021). Portuguese Version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties. Marriage & Family Review, 57(7), 647-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2021.1887047
4. Austin, W. G., & Drozd, L. M. (2012). Intimate partner violence and child custody evaluation, Part I: Theoretical framework, forensic model, and assessment issues. Journal of Child Custody, 9(4), 250-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2012.749717
5. Austin, W. G., Fieldstone, L., & Pruett, M. K. (2013). Bench book for assessing parental gatekeeping in parenting disputes: Understanding the dynamics of gate closing and opening for the best interests of children. Journal of Child Custody, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2013.778693