A comparative study on the selection of the most suitable route for the collection and transportation of municipal solid waste
Author:
KARABULUT Abdullah İzzeddin1ORCID, YAZICI KARABULUT Benan1ORCID, DERİN Perihan1ORCID, YEŞİLNACAR Mehmet İrfan2ORCID, PAMUKÇU Hale1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. HARRAN UNIVERSITY 2. HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
Worldwide, approximately US$410 billion is spent annually on the management of four billion tons of domestic solid waste (MSW). The transportation cost alone accounts for more than 50% of the total expenditure on solid waste management. This cost constitutes approximately 85% of the collection and transportation cost. 54.4% of environmental protection expenditures cover waste services. The population of the Barış neighborhood in the Kayapınar district of Diyarbakır, which is the subject of this study, is 23 581 according to the 2020 TUIK data. The average amount of waste produced per person in a month is 7.6 kg/person. In the results of these statistics, it has been seen that the investment costs in the transportation of wastes are increasing day by day. In this study, the performance of ant colony and genetic algorithms, which are among the artificial intelligence techniques, and route optimization using GIS (geographic information system) software were tried to be achieved to solve the GSP (traveling salesman problem), which is included in the route planning problems. The results of the study showed that savings were achieved with an improvement of 15.1576% in GIS, 29.8104% in GA (Genetic algorithm) and 40.5171% in ACS (Ant Colony System) compared to real life. As a result of the application, it has been observed that the ant colony algorithm is superior to the Genetic algorithm and GIS, as it draws a shorter route in terms of distance and obtains a better result in terms of improvement rate.
Publisher
Environmental Research and Technology
Subject
Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering
Reference38 articles.
1. A. İ., Karabulut, B., Yazici-Karabulut, P. Derin, M. İ., Yesilnacar, and M. A., Çullu, “Landfill siting for municipal solid waste using remote sensing and geographic information system integrated analytic hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods from the point of view of a fast-growing metropolitan area in GAP area of Turkey,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 4044–4061, 2022. [CrossRef] 2. S., Varjani, H., Shahbeig, K., Popat, Z., Patel, S., Vyas, A. V., Shah, and M., Tabatabaei, “Sustainable management of municipal solid waste through waste-to-energy technologies,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 355, Article 127247, 2022. [CrossRef] 3. W., Xue, K., Cao, and W. Li, “Municipal solid waste collection optimization in Singapore,” Applied Geography, Vol. 62, pp. 182190, 2015. [CrossRef] 4. K., Nguyen-Trong, A., Nguyen-Thi-Ngoc, D., Nguyen-Ngoc, and V., Dinh-Thi-Hai, “Optimization of municipal solid waste transportation by integrating GIS analysis, equation-based, and agent-based model,” Waste Management, Vol. 59, pp. 1422, 2017. [CrossRef] 5. E., Babaee Tirkolaee, I., Mahdavi, M. M., Seyyed Esfahani, and G. W., Weber, “A hybrid augmented ant colony optimization for the multi-trip capacitated arc routing problem under fuzzy demands for urban solid waste management,” Waste Management and Research, Vol. 38(2), pp. 156172, 2020. [CrossRef]
|
|